2010
DOI: 10.1364/ao.49.004836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimode excitation-induced phase shifts in intrinsic Fabry–Perot interferometric fiber sensor spectra

Abstract: We report the modal analysis of optical fiber single-mode-multimode-single-mode intrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometer sensors. The multimode nature of the Fabry-Perot cavity gives rise to an additional phase term in the spectrogram due to intermodal dispersion-induced wavefront distortion, which could significantly affect the cavity length demodulation accuracy. By using an exact model to analyze the modal behavior, this phase term is explained by employing a rotating vector approach. Comparison of the theoreti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, the greater the distortion is, the larger the phase term; as the distortion is OPD-dependent, so is the induced phase. For EFPIs, detailed analysis can be found in [25,33,34], and the case for IFPIs was studied in [35]. In general, for an EFPI, the phase term caused by wave front distortion is small and changes moderately with OPD; for an IFPI, due to multimode excitation, this term could be large and change more rapidly.…”
Section: Wave Front Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, the greater the distortion is, the larger the phase term; as the distortion is OPD-dependent, so is the induced phase. For EFPIs, detailed analysis can be found in [25,33,34], and the case for IFPIs was studied in [35]. In general, for an EFPI, the phase term caused by wave front distortion is small and changes moderately with OPD; for an IFPI, due to multimode excitation, this term could be large and change more rapidly.…”
Section: Wave Front Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum of the SMS-IFPI, normalized with respect to the input power, is expressed as [19]   where R is the reflectivity of the splicing point and L is the length of the FP cavity. For WLI based signal demodulation, the optical path difference (OPD), defined as…”
Section: The Spectrum Of Gi-mmf Based Ifpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-constant phase-induced OPD demodulation jumps To interrogate a low-finesse FP sensor, the phase of the periodic fringe pattern is measured at either a fraction or all of the sampling points in the spectrogram [20,21,22,23]. This interference spectrum is represented by S(k)  cos[Φ(k)], where k=2π/λ is the optical wavenumber, λ is the wavelength, Φ(k) is the total interferogram phase which is expressed as Φ(k) = k  OPD + φ 0 , where φ 0 is an additional phase term caused by beam reflection and propagation [19,24]. In traditional OPD-based demodulation, the additional phase term φ 0 is usually assumed to be constant during measurement process and needs to be pre-calibrated [21,22].…”
Section: Sensor Signal Processing and The Total Phase Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While it is well understood that the demodulation error scales with noise power in the spectrum [10], the demand for high fringe visibility becomes crucial, especially if a multimode fiber (MMF) is used for excitation. During the past few years, it has been reported in several publications [8,11,12] that the additional phase in the spectrum also plays an important role in signal processing, which may potentially lead to abrupt jumps in the demodulated sensor cavity length. As such, in-depth theoretical modeling for both single-mode fiber (SMF) and MMF based EFPIs have been investigated in the past two decades [8,[13][14][15], aiming to find the dependence of sensor output spectrum on sensor geometry and optical property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%