2010
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.09.2355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodality Imaging of Triple Receptor–Negative Tumors With Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI

Abstract: Despite their large size at presentation, triple receptor-negative cancers may be occult on mammography or sonography and frequently have benign or indeterminate features. MRI identified all triple receptor-negative cancers and showed features that had a high positive predictive value for malignancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
121
6
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
22
121
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies would be required. Dogan et al (2010) investigated the features of TNBC by mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TNBC were visualized by MRI in all cases, and in 91% and 93% of cases by mammography and ultrasound respectively which the percentages of conceal cases were higher than our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies would be required. Dogan et al (2010) investigated the features of TNBC by mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TNBC were visualized by MRI in all cases, and in 91% and 93% of cases by mammography and ultrasound respectively which the percentages of conceal cases were higher than our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies also have discussed the features of triple-negative breast cancers (negativity of ER, PR, and HER2) (Dogan et al, 2010;Ko et al, 2010;Dogan et al, 2012;Krizmanich et al, 2012;Wojcinski et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014). However, correlations between ER, PR, HER2 and ultrasound findings in previous studies were varied and none had calculated the logistic regression model for reliable identification of molecular status (Kim et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008;Au et al, 2009;Dogan et al, 2010;Ko et al, 2010a;2010b;Dogan et al, 2012;Krizmanich et al, 2012;Wojcinski et al, 2012;Irshad et al, 2013). The aim of this retrospective study was thus to 1)evaluating the correlation of images findings with the corresponding molecular features, 2)characterizing the various ultrasound features in breast cancer by using logistic regression models, in order to identify the factors that might help in predicting the status of molecular.…”
Section: Ultrasound Utility For Predicting Biological Behavior Of Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TN breast cancers are less likely than other subtypes to manifest as microcalcifications on mammographic images, and they show circumscribed margins on US scans more often, which are features that may delay the diagnosis of cancer with these traditional imaging methods (9,10). DCE MR imaging has high sensitivity for cases of TN breast cancer that are occult at mammographic imaging or US, and certain features of DCE MR imaging have high specificity for TN breast cancer compared with cancers that are estrogen receptorpositive, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative (11,12). TN breast cancer demonstrates higher SUV max than other subtypes, and PET/ CT can help identify TN breast cancer patients at increased risk of early relapse (13,14).…”
Section: Patients and Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct for this phenomenon, known as partial volume error, we used a previously described (16) mathematical technique by using calibration measurements from each PET scanner as a function of object size. A body phantom that contained spheres of varying diameters (8,12,16, and 25 mm) and filled with known concentrations of FDG was placed in each PET/ CT scanner. A transmission PET image was acquired from which the calculated activity of each sphere was determined and compared with known activity.…”
Section: Pet/ct Imaging Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%