2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2738-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimethod Evaluation of the VA’s Peer-to-Peer Toolkit for Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, a common denominator is that interventions are limited to specific medical or technical methods or procedures. Applications of CFIR to more general MIs are rare, but some have been presented; for example, for a reimbursement and benchmarking system [36], a health care delivery redesign project [37], a “patient-aligned toolkit” [38], and primary care leadership [39]. Notably, though, Damschroder et al ([10] (Additional file 4)) argued that even though CFIR is intended for all kinds of innovations, “administrative interventions tend to be more complex and difficult to implement” .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a common denominator is that interventions are limited to specific medical or technical methods or procedures. Applications of CFIR to more general MIs are rare, but some have been presented; for example, for a reimbursement and benchmarking system [36], a health care delivery redesign project [37], a “patient-aligned toolkit” [38], and primary care leadership [39]. Notably, though, Damschroder et al ([10] (Additional file 4)) argued that even though CFIR is intended for all kinds of innovations, “administrative interventions tend to be more complex and difficult to implement” .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study shows that multi-dimensional PCMH based curricular innovations in the WCGME's Internal Medicine residency significantly enhanced THC residents' self-reported KSA by the end of their internship year and that these improvements over baseline were maintained through three Effect of PCMH innovations on patient outcomes, care delivery organizational structure and cost effectiveness have been debated in the literature [19,20,21,22]. Hochman et.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Though earlier small sample studies showed enhanced patient outcomes with the PCMH model [19,20], a recent large study by Friedberg et al [21] showed limited improvement in quality and no improvement in health care utilization or cost effectiveness among multiple practices that adopted this model for three years, suggesting further refinement is necessary in PCMH interventions [21]. Financial sustainability of PCMH interventions in current form is evaluations, direct observation tools, and ACGME reportable milestones outcomes, as well as patient care delivery process and health outcomes, are required before firm inferences can be made from our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study shows that multi-dimensional PCMH based curricular innovations in the WCGME's Effect of PCMH innovations on patient outcomes, care delivery organizational structure and cost effectiveness have been debated in the literature [19,20,21,22]. Hochman et.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%