Multilayered International Parliamentarism: The Case of EU-Brazil Relations

Abstract

Abstract:Challenging the predominant scholarly focus on international parliamentary institutions as the sole and sufficient object of inquiry into the global role of parliaments, this article argues that international interparliamentary relations do not occur merely within isolated forums, but may and do de facto evolve in layers of overlapping forums whenever circumstances allow it. This article conceptualises multilayered international parliamentarism as developing in webs of formal and informal linkages between the same parliamentary institutions in a variety of bilateral and multilateral frameworks regarding the same region. To this end, I conduct an in-depth case study of bilateral and multilateral relations between the parliaments of the EU and Brazil through the lens of institutional arrangements as well as by examining the reaction of the Brazilian and certain other Latin American parliaments to the EU's Returns Directive. The analysis shows that intensified international contacts among parliamentarians accentuate the deliberative function of parliaments and foster their 'diplomatic' actorship in foreign affairs in a concerted attempt to counterbalance globalisation-propelled 'negotiated democracy' nurtured by intergovernmental and transgovernmental ways of doing politics and making law.

Bringing transnationalism (once again) back in: insights for the parliamentary dimension of European foreign policy

“…Granted, attention has been yielded to the rise of inter-parliamentary cooperation (Crum and Fossum, 2009;Crum and Fossum, 2013) or 'multilayered parliamentarism' (Jancic, 2014;Jancic, 2015) within and beyond the EU. Yet thus far, this debate remains limited to the study of interparliamentary cooperation within the EU, and is heavily embedded in discourses or theories on democracy and legitimacy.…”

Parliamentary Networks in Transnational Economic Governance

“…Не менее важной в таком случае предстаёт их роль в качестве арены для обсуждения важнейших вопросов, а также их потенциала по оказанию информационной поддержки национальным парламентариям и их поощрению к большей международной активности. В отсутствие у них конституционных полномочий по части законотворчества и демократического контроля исполнительной власти вне национальных рамок, основной упор в международной деятельности национальных парламентов смещается к делиберации [7].…”