2004
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2004.18.728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidisciplinary HIV Adherence Intervention: A Randomized Study

Abstract: Maintaining greater than 95% adherence to antiretroviral medication is necessary in order to have the greatest therapeutic impact on HIV infection. Furthermore, evidence suggests that adherence rates of between 70% and 89% are significantly associated with viral rebound and the development of drug resistance. Adherence rates at and above the 95% level are difficult for patients to achieve and maintain. Our aim was to determine if an adherence intervention could improve adherence among patients attending an amb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, participation in multidisciplinary activities offered by health-care services served as a protective factor against non-adherence suggesting that involving different health professionals favors treatment and the assessment of different aspects of health care. Some studies have addressed characteristics of health-care services and multidisciplinary strategies aimed at adult patients, stressing the positive impact of a multidisciplinary team, on adherence and disease control indicators (Bonolo et al, 2005;Dieckhaus & Odesina, 2007;Frick, Tapia, Grant, Novotny, & Kerzee, 2006;Levy et al, 2004;Nemes, Carvalho, & Souza, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, participation in multidisciplinary activities offered by health-care services served as a protective factor against non-adherence suggesting that involving different health professionals favors treatment and the assessment of different aspects of health care. Some studies have addressed characteristics of health-care services and multidisciplinary strategies aimed at adult patients, stressing the positive impact of a multidisciplinary team, on adherence and disease control indicators (Bonolo et al, 2005;Dieckhaus & Odesina, 2007;Frick, Tapia, Grant, Novotny, & Kerzee, 2006;Levy et al, 2004;Nemes, Carvalho, & Souza, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While drug level monitoring provides an objective value, it is impractical and potentially quite expensive depending on the number of drugs measured. Additionally, the level probably represents short-term adherence rather than day-to-day (Deschamps et al, 2004;Levy et al, 2004). However, non-adherence can still be very difficult to diagnose, leading to unnecessary ARV changes due to presumed HIV resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, adherence is typically assessed through interview and pill counts. More intensive measures such as MEMS™ caps or drug level monitoring may be used for more accurate information and in clinical trials (Deschamps et al, 2004;Levy et al, 2004). However, non-adherence can still be very difficult to diagnose, leading to unnecessary ARV changes due to presumed HIV resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not targeted at Latinos, given the rarity of such studies, they need further discussion. Levy and colleagues 11 evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary HIV adherence intervention for patients attending an ambulatory clinic at a large public hospital using both generalized education conducted by the study pharmacist and/or nurse and individualized follow up. Using multiple observations, they reported a significant decrease in self-reported number of missed doses for 4-, 7-, and 28-day time periods and a decrease in Morisky score, indicating an improvement in medication-taking behavior before and after the intervention.…”
Section: Adherence Enhancement Programmentioning
confidence: 99%