Multidimensional Poverty Analysis of Urban and Rural Households in South Africa

Abstract

The study profiled and compared household multidimensional poverty status and its determinants among urban and rural households in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, using information from a sample population of 3033 households interviewed from the Province during the General Household Survey conducted by the Statistics South Africa in 2014. Analytical techniques utilized include the recent multidimensional poverty index (MPI), descriptive statistics and Tobit regression. Findings reveal that multiple deprivations are found mostly in the rural area of the province; the multidimensional headcount is highest in the rural area, though the intensity of multidimensional poverty is almost similar in both geographical locations. The standard of living dimension is also the largest contribution to MPI in both locations. MPI has significant links with education attainment of household head, access to electricity and asset stock in both geographical locations, but is influenced by the gender of head, agriculture engagement and household monthly income in rural areas only. In order to improve households' multidimensional poverty status in both urban and rural locations, there is the need to take into account some significant variables such as education of head, increase electricity subsidy coverage during winter period, asset accumulation and increase in households' participation in agricultural activities, especially those residing in rural areas. JEL classification: I32

An analysis of multidimensional poverty and its determinants in the public university host communities in Ondo State, Nigeria

“…In addition, urban dwellers are better exposed to more opportunities than their rural counterparts. This finding is consistent with those reported by Ebenezer and Abbyssinia (2018) and Megbowon (2018) on Eastern Cape province of South Africa. Comparable finding has also been documented by Trani et al (2016) It is also evident from the results that households whose residences are far from the university are more at the risk of falling into multidimensional poverty.…”

“…As a matter of fact, evidence exists to have shown the effect of location on the possibility of being multidimensionally poor. Evidence from a recent study by Megbowon (2018) on Eastern Cape province of South Africa indicates higher prevalence of multidimensional poverty in the rural than urban areas. Comparable empirical evidence has also been documented by Trani et al (2016) in their study on Afghanistan.…”

Fuzzy set approach to measuring urban poverty: a case of Lagos State slums

“…They also found that of the three dimensions they examined, health had the highest deprivation However, Amukoko had the highest dimension deprivation as education and lowest as living standards. This is in contrary to the findings by Megbowon (2018), who examined multi-dimensional poverty in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. The standard of living contributed the highest MPI in the area.…”

“…Electricity, flooring, assets and cooking fuel indicators had relatively low index across the slums. Unlike the assertion that electricity supply was a major deprivation suffered by the slum dwellers (Ige and Nekhwevha, 2014;Megbowon, 2018), this study shows that the electricity index has a low index compared to other indicators measured. Again, the majority of the house structure with the exception of Makoko and Iwaya were constructed with cement blocks and well-floored.…”

Analysis of Poverty Correlates and Multi‐Dimensionality in South East Nigeria: New Empirical Evidence From Survey Data

“…The most striking thing about poverty is that it has become multi-dimensional phenomenon overtime (Jung-Eun, Won-Hong, Bong, & In, 2015;Oshio & Kan, 2014). This perspective on poverty goes beyond the traditional uni-dimensional approach that primarily focuses on income or consumption expenditure (Megbowon, 2018). The justification behind this is based on the idea that income indicator is incomplete and its shortfalls lead to inaccurate estimations of poverty (Diaz, 2003).…”