2020
DOI: 10.31181/dmame2003019d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria Decision Making Model with Z-Numbers Based on FUCOM and MABAC model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike other subjective models, the FUCOM has shown minor deviations in the obtained values of the weights of criteria from the optimum values [9]. Moreover, the methodological procedure of the FUCOM eliminates the problem of redundancy of pairwise comparisons of criteria, which is present in some subjective models for determining the weights of criteria [10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike other subjective models, the FUCOM has shown minor deviations in the obtained values of the weights of criteria from the optimum values [9]. Moreover, the methodological procedure of the FUCOM eliminates the problem of redundancy of pairwise comparisons of criteria, which is present in some subjective models for determining the weights of criteria [10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves fuzzy reliability in addition to the fuzzy restriction that enables analysts to take into account the uncertainty that occurred from the reliability of the decision-makers. Since it has more capability to describe the uncertainty, there are various approaches which are combined with Z-numbers to evaluate MCDM problems [67,68,[92][93][94][95].…”
Section: Literature Review On Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the weight coefficients of the membership functions should reflect reality as much as possible. In this particular case, w (xi) (j) was determined by interviewing experts and applying the FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) method (Pamučar et al, 2018), (Bozanic et al, 2019), (Fazlollahtabar et al, 2019), (Puška et al, 2019), (Erceg & Mularifović, 2019), (Durmić, 2019), (Nenadić, 2019), (Žižović & Pamucar, 2019), (Bozanic et al, 2020), (Durmić et al, 2020). Three experts were interviewed, and the results of the calculation of the weight coefficients are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Most Often W (Xi)mentioning
confidence: 99%