2017
DOI: 10.1002/uog.17455
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter screening for pre‐eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations

Abstract: Objective To compare the performance of screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) based on risk factors from medical history, as recommended by NICE and ACOG, with the method proposed by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
227
2
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
227
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends the use of aspirin in women with a history of PE in more than one pregnancy or a history of PE that resulted in delivery before 34 weeks' gestation. However, this subgroup constitutes only approximately 0.3% of all pregnancies and includes only 5% of women who develop preterm PE. Our approach to screening with the use of Bayes' theorem to combine the a‐priori risk from maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical measurements obtained at 11–13 weeks' gestation is by far superior to those of NICE and ACOG in identifying the group who would benefit from prophylactic use of aspirin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends the use of aspirin in women with a history of PE in more than one pregnancy or a history of PE that resulted in delivery before 34 weeks' gestation. However, this subgroup constitutes only approximately 0.3% of all pregnancies and includes only 5% of women who develop preterm PE. Our approach to screening with the use of Bayes' theorem to combine the a‐priori risk from maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical measurements obtained at 11–13 weeks' gestation is by far superior to those of NICE and ACOG in identifying the group who would benefit from prophylactic use of aspirin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ASPRE study, these parameters were integrated together with biochemical and biophysical markers to stratify the patients at high risk for developing intermediate PE, and its prevention by aspirin [4648]. The ASPRE study was less successful in the prediction and prevention of term PE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of such screening is poor, with detection of about 40% of preterm pre‐eclampsia cases and 33% of term pre‐eclampsia cases at a screen‐positive rate of 11% . In the USA, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG) recommends use of aspirin for women with a history of pre‐eclampsia in more than one pregnancy or history of pre‐eclampsia requiring delivery before 34 weeks of gestation; however, this subgroup constitutes about 0.3% of all pregnancies and contains only 5% of those that would develop preterm pre‐eclampsia and 2% of term pre‐eclampsia …”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%