“…Based on the model outcomes, vaccinating boys is projected to reduce anal cancer and genital wart incidence in males, and also provide additional protection for females with substantial reductions in the incidence of cervical cancer, precancerous cervical lesions, anal cancer, and genital warts. Although HPV vaccines are not indicated for the prevention of RRP, head and neck cancer, and penile cancer as per label (Gardasil, 2018), there is evidence demonstrating the efficacy of HPV vaccines in reducing persistent HPV infections at these anatomic sites (e.g., persistent external genital infection (Giuliano et al, 2011), persistent oral infection (Herrero et al, 2013;Wilkin et al, 2018), and many countries and international literature considered that HPV vaccines may protect against these diseases, (Takla et al, 2018;Burger et al, 2014;Chesson et al, 2016;Joint committee on Vaccination and Immunization, 2018;Mauz et al, 2018;Boiron et al, 2016;Matsuzaki et al, 2020). Our model suggests GNV with the 9vHPV vaccine is a cost-effective strategy in Flanders (vs. FOV with the 9vHPV vaccine), Wallonia-Brussels (vs. FOV with the 2vHPV vaccine), and the Belgium national catchup program (vs. FOV with the 9vHPV vaccine), with the ICERs being €8,062, €4,179, and €6,127 in the three programs, respectively.…”