2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi7040129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Temporal Land Cover Classification with Sequential Recurrent Encoders

Abstract: Earth observation (EO) sensors deliver data at daily or weekly intervals. Most land use and land cover classification (LULC) approaches, however, are designed for cloud-free and mono-temporal observations. The increasing temporal capabilities of today's sensors enable the use of temporal, along with spectral and spatial features.Domains such as speech recognition or neural machine translation, work with inherently temporal data and, today, achieve impressive results by using sequential encoder-decoder structur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
184
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(82 reference statements)
3
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First developed for sequential data, RNN models have been recently applied to several classification tasks in remote sensing, especially for crop mapping [45,46,48]. They share the learned features across different positions.…”
Section: Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First developed for sequential data, RNN models have been recently applied to several classification tasks in remote sensing, especially for crop mapping [45,46,48]. They share the learned features across different positions.…”
Section: Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the most recent studies, we have trained bidirectional RNNs composed of the stack of three GRUs, one dense layer (256 neurons) and a Softmax layer [46,48]. The same number of neurons is used in the three GRUs.…”
Section: Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 illustrates the processed Sentinel-2 image of central Munich, Germany, and the reference data. There are two approaches for remote sensing image classification via deep learning: working with either patch-based CNNs designed for image classification [24,26,30,31,32,49,50,51] or encoder-decoder-like neural networks designed for semantic segmentation [25,27,28,29]. The former works under the assumption of just a single label for each image patch, and applies the trained model to the image of a study area via a sliding window approach, with the target GSD as the stride of the sliding window.…”
Section: Sentinel-2 Image Pre-processing and Reference Ground Truth Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, getting sufficient reliable pixel-wise ground truth data, a major prerequisite for deep learning-based approaches, is more challenging than labelling standard photos that are the main subject of computer vision research. Therefore, we suggest to create annotations by exploiting geo-referenced map products such as the CORINE Land Cover data [37] and the MOD500 data [38,35], as well as governmental data [30], which contains information relevant to the task one seeks to achieve. Second, remote sensing images differ significantly in appearance from the close-range images used in the standard literature on scene segmentation [39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent neural networks (RNN) are a family of deep learning methods designed to manage temporal correlations between images in time series. These networks have recurrent connections in the sense that they keep information in memory: they can take into account at time T n a number of past states T i where i < n. These networks have been used in remote sensing to assess change detection in multi-spectral and hyper-spectral images [32]. RNNs are able to memorize information for a limited time and start to "forget" after a certain number of iterations, which makes training for many applications complicated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%