2018 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icb2018.2018.00038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-spectral Imaging for Robust Ocular Biometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in an effective rate of return of 20.07 percent. In compared to a prior three-layer neural network baseline approach, the PER obtained is better [66]. Smartphones and their camera resolution have been tried and tested for iris recognition.…”
Section: Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This resulted in an effective rate of return of 20.07 percent. In compared to a prior three-layer neural network baseline approach, the PER obtained is better [66]. Smartphones and their camera resolution have been tried and tested for iris recognition.…”
Section: Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning algorithms improve as they get more experience. The next few years should be remarkable as technology continues to advance [66].…”
Section: Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CASIA dataset 36 contains VIS and NIR periocular images from 200 subjects, cropped originally from the existing heterogeneous CASIA NIR-VIS 2.0 face dataset. 70 Vetrekar et al 19 used an automatic face landmark detection method to locate eye coordinates and crop periocular regions. A similar approach is employed in the case of the CASIA dataset in which the Viola-Jones algorithm 71 is used to crop periocular regions automatically from the face images.…”
Section: Datasets and Experiments Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 Instead of using simple distance measures, some works focused on training additional classifiers using handcrafted features to classify periocular images in heterogeneous domains. Such classifiers included neural networks, 16 Markov random fields, 17 support vector machines, 18 and collaborative representation classifiers 19 . Sequeira et al 20 , 21 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation