2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotri.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Scale Evaluation of Wear in UHMWPE-Metal Hip Implants Tested in a hip Joint Simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2A) and of stainless steel (three specimen pairs, results in Fig. 2B) up to five million cycles 31 . From the slope of the graphical representation, and assuming a linear curve using the least square method, it is possible to estimate the wear rate of each individual sample 37 .…”
Section: Hip Wear Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2A) and of stainless steel (three specimen pairs, results in Fig. 2B) up to five million cycles 31 . From the slope of the graphical representation, and assuming a linear curve using the least square method, it is possible to estimate the wear rate of each individual sample 37 .…”
Section: Hip Wear Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using advanced techniques for atomic level analyses of the UHMWPE can reveal aspects of material structure modifications related to wear performance. The wear performance can become worst if the UHMWPE material undergoes strain softening while running under multi-directional mechanical stress field 30, 31…”
Section: Why Simulate Wear In a Hip Implant?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is a scarcity of available information regarding the variation of sliding distance or CS ratio among THA patients and their association with patient‐specific in vivo kinematics and component orientation. Existing computational models in the current literature rely heavily on kinematic inputs either from standard laboratory testing protocols or from single subject data in the literature …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%