2018
DOI: 10.22331/q-2018-10-19-102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-path Summation for Decoding 2D Topological Codes

Abstract: Fault tolerance is a prerequisite for scalable quantum computing. Architectures based on 2D topological codes are effective for near-term implementations of fault tolerance. To obtain high performance with these architectures, we require a decoder which can adapt to the wide variety of error models present in experiments. The typical approach to the problem of decoding the surface code is to reduce it to minimum-weight perfect matching in a way that provides a suboptimal threshold error rate, and is specialize… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm takes a graph with weighted edges and returns a subset of the edges of the original graph such that each vertex has exactly one incident edge and the sum of the weights of the edges that are returned is minimal. We use this algorithm by assigning each defect a vertex of the graph, and adding edges to the graph that are weighted to approximate the logarithm of the likelihood that a Pauli-error caused the pair of defects that are connected by the edge [14,[45][46][47][48][49]. Most interestingly, all the decoders we present use matching subroutines on the defects lying on L×L planes of the system rather than its full volume.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm takes a graph with weighted edges and returns a subset of the edges of the original graph such that each vertex has exactly one incident edge and the sum of the weights of the edges that are returned is minimal. We use this algorithm by assigning each defect a vertex of the graph, and adding edges to the graph that are weighted to approximate the logarithm of the likelihood that a Pauli-error caused the pair of defects that are connected by the edge [14,[45][46][47][48][49]. Most interestingly, all the decoders we present use matching subroutines on the defects lying on L×L planes of the system rather than its full volume.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of belief propagation has been applied in the quantum setting in many different previous works; here we comment on their relation to the present work. Most closely related is the use of belief propagation for decoding quantum information subject to Pauli errors, as studied by Poulin in [13,14], as well as many others since [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Here, however, classical BP is sufficient: The task is to infer which error occured from the classical syndrome information, which only involves the classical conditional probability of the former given the latter.…”
Section: Other Notions Of Quantum Belief Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the neural network decoder and the improved blossom decoder perform below the optimal maximum-likelihood decoder. Several approaches exist to reach the optimal limit, we mention the incorporation of X-Z correlations via a belief propagation algorithm [37], and approaches based on renormalization group methods or Monte Carlo methods [28,38,39].…”
Section: Approaches Going Beyond Blossom Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of algorithms [28,33,[36][37][38][39] that improve on the blossom decoder does not diminish the appeal of machine learning decoders, since these offer a flexibility to different types of topological codes that a dedicated decoder lacks.…”
Section: Approaches Based On Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%