2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-parameter model reduction in multi-scale convective systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the mean error, the standard deviation, and the Euclidean L2 norm of the POD temperature error at all 114,000 points of the rack scale for 15 test cases have been shown in Samadiani and Joshi. 12 The mean error varies from 0.35 o C to 2.29 o C, while the average error is 1.36 o C, and the average standard deviation 1.12 o C. Also, the error norm changes from 1.8% to 10.1%, while the average is 6.2%. 12 These values confirm that the presented POD method is accurate enough at the rack scale for design purposes.…”
Section: Pod and Galerkin Projection For Thermal Modeling Of Multi Camentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the mean error, the standard deviation, and the Euclidean L2 norm of the POD temperature error at all 114,000 points of the rack scale for 15 test cases have been shown in Samadiani and Joshi. 12 The mean error varies from 0.35 o C to 2.29 o C, while the average error is 1.36 o C, and the average standard deviation 1.12 o C. Also, the error norm changes from 1.8% to 10.1%, while the average is 6.2%. 12 These values confirm that the presented POD method is accurate enough at the rack scale for design purposes.…”
Section: Pod and Galerkin Projection For Thermal Modeling Of Multi Camentioning
confidence: 93%
“…12 The mean error varies from 0.35 o C to 2.29 o C, while the average error is 1.36 o C, and the average standard deviation 1.12 o C. Also, the error norm changes from 1.8% to 10.1%, while the average is 6.2%. 12 These values confirm that the presented POD method is accurate enough at the rack scale for design purposes. The main goal of the suggested algorithm in Samadiani and Joshi 12 is to predict air temperatures at the rack inlet/outlets and inside the racks accurately and quickly for design purposes.…”
Section: Pod and Galerkin Projection For Thermal Modeling Of Multi Camentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides that, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), as a reduced-order model algorithm, is widely used to derive temperature profiles from observations [15,16]. Samadiani et al developed a POD-based modeling framework to predict the temperature distribution in computer room [17,18]. Based on the POD-based model, they proposed a compromise decision support problem to optimize the design parameters of data center.…”
Section: Relate Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is another observation based method that is capable of predicting the air flow and temperature fields inside a DC much faster than CFD simulation [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Samadiani et al [27] used POD to derive the thermal map of a DC as a function of the CRAC air flow rate.…”
Section: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%