2018
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v8i5.pp3427-3435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective based Optimal Energy and Reactive Power Dispatch in Deregulated Electricity Markets

Abstract: This paper presents a day-ahead (DA) multi-objective based joint energy and reactive power dispatch in the deregulated electricity markets. The traditional social welfare in the centralized electricity markets comprises of customers benefit function and the cost function of active power generation. In this paper, the traditional social welfare is modified to incorporate the cost of both active and reactive power generation. Here, the voltage dependent load modeling is used. This paper brings out the unsuitabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reactive power generated at bus i must be in the range of maximum and minimum reactive power generated by the generator stated in (9).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactive power generated at bus i must be in the range of maximum and minimum reactive power generated by the generator stated in (9).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this market model, active power market is cleared first and then by using these results the reactive power market is cleared next. Generally, in any competitive electricity market, the problem of active power dispatch is formulated by using the cost minimization or social welfare maximization [15]. In this market model, two objective functions, i.e., fuel cost (FC) minimization and social welfare maximization (SWM) are considered.…”
Section: Market Model 1: Conventional/sequential Market Clearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infeasible solutions are penalized by applying a constant penalty to those solutions, which violate feasibility in any way. The penalized objective function would then be the unpenalized objective function "J" plus a penalty (for a minimization problem) [26]. The violated functional operating constraints are incorporated as penalties in objective function.…”
Section: Enhanced Genetic Algorithms (Ega)mentioning
confidence: 99%