2019
DOI: 10.1101/812982
View full text | Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: AbstractThe brain-age paradigm is proving increasingly useful for exploring ageing-related disease and can predict important future health outcomes. Most brain-age research utilises structural neuroimaging to index brain volume. However, ageing affects multiple aspects of brain structure and function, which can be examined using multi-modality neuroimaging. Using UK Biobank, brain-age was modelled in n=2,205 healthy people with T1-weighted MRI, T2-FLAIR, T2*, diffusion-MRI, tas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
37
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
6
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of multiple brain age models can be informative in patient groups where tissue types are differently affected by disease (56, 57, 76-78), leading to varying brain age predic-tions across models. However, such models could be more closely related in healthy samples (55) such as the current cohort, which aligns with the relatively consistent results observed across models (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although previous studies have suggested better prediction with multiple imaging modalities [13,14,30,54], the current study showed equivalent prediction accuracy between the multimodal model and the gray and white matter models. The exclusion of low-quality data improved the performance of the multimodal model, suggesting that established procedures for data quality control may have implications for model performance [39,55].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…To obtain a direct comparison of β values, both the brain-age deltas and the clinical variables were standardized (subtracting the mean and dividing by the SD) before a series of multiple regressions were run. In order to adjust for a frequently observed bias in brain-age prediction leading to an overestimation of brain age in younger subjects and an underestimation of brain age in older subjects [14,15,30,51,52], chronological age was included as a covariate. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed using false-discovery rate correction [53].…”
Section: Brain Age Delta and Biomedical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations