1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0056295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-modal volume registration using joint intensity distributions

Abstract: Abstract. The registration of multimodal medical images is an important tool in surgical applications, since different scan modalities highlight complementary anatomical structures. We present a method of computing the best rigid registration of pairs of medical images of the same patient. The method uses prior information on the expected joint intensity distribution of the images when correctly aligned, given a priori registered training images. We discuss two methods of modeling the joint intensity distribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With 15 randomly generated rigid transformations, we applied 3 different functions: bi-linear, Cubic B-spline and Gaussian, as the interpolation kernels to estimate the motion parameters. These transformations are normally distributed around the values of (10 • , 10 pixel, 10 pixel), with standard deviations of (3 • , 3 pixel 3 pixel) for rotation and translation in x and y respectively. Table 1 3 Segmentation-Guided Deformable Image Registration Frameworks [14] In this section, we address the second and third challenges we pointed out in the section 1.2: how to integrate segmentation and registration into a unified procedure so that the prior information embedded in both processes can be better utilized.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 15 randomly generated rigid transformations, we applied 3 different functions: bi-linear, Cubic B-spline and Gaussian, as the interpolation kernels to estimate the motion parameters. These transformations are normally distributed around the values of (10 • , 10 pixel, 10 pixel), with standard deviations of (3 • , 3 pixel 3 pixel) for rotation and translation in x and y respectively. Table 1 3 Segmentation-Guided Deformable Image Registration Frameworks [14] In this section, we address the second and third challenges we pointed out in the section 1.2: how to integrate segmentation and registration into a unified procedure so that the prior information embedded in both processes can be better utilized.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our research, registration algorithms are divided into two groups: 2D registration and 3D registration. We use mutual information [4,5] or FFT [6] to align our datasets in registration framework, in which the common part of two datasets is normally 2D. Also, we use 3D registration to fuse two 3D estimation models, I A V and I B V , in visualization framework.…”
Section: Registration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] the log likelihood of the joint intensity distribution of the observed images was maximized with respect to the expected joint intensity distribution. In [6] it was shown empirically that using the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) was superior to the log likelihood measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%