2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-male mating, probability of conception, and litter size in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this population, more than half of the sampled females had litters sired by more than one male. These data are consistent with laboratory studies in which females mated with more than one male (Evans and Dewsbury 1978;Wolff and Dunlap 2002). Our results raise the possibility that extra-pair copulations may be common in at least some prairie vole populations and that the monogamy previously inferred for this species may be more social than genetic.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this population, more than half of the sampled females had litters sired by more than one male. These data are consistent with laboratory studies in which females mated with more than one male (Evans and Dewsbury 1978;Wolff and Dunlap 2002). Our results raise the possibility that extra-pair copulations may be common in at least some prairie vole populations and that the monogamy previously inferred for this species may be more social than genetic.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Tethering involves using a plastic zip-tie as a collar connected to a lightweight chain attached to the apparatus and does not inhibit animals from normal activities (e.g. moving, eating or mating; Ophir et al 2007; Wolff & Dunplap 2002). Females were given a 20 min acclimation period to adjust to the collars following tethering and were observed during this period for discomfort and distress (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin a choice test, males serving as either a PAR or NPAR stimulus male were tethered in one of two separate 'holding' chambers in a three-chambered apparatus following the design and methods of Wolff and Dunlap [2002]. PAR and NPAR males were counterbalanced for side from one trial to the next.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%