Theories of psychological constructs like personality, pathology, or cognition, give rise to models that implicitly or explicitly impose a causal structure on mental processes. As there are rarely feasible ways to experimentally isolate and/or individually manipulate psychological variables, evaluating these causal structures is challenging. Competing causal theories, like latent variable and network theories, of psychological constructs are often evaluated based on correlational data, which rarely provide satisfactory conclusions on their relative merits. We discuss three methods that can improve our collective ability to distinguish between models derived from competing theories of psychological constructs. These methods significantly expand the set of models that are empirically identified in structural equation models (SEM) by respectively implementing penalized instrumental variable regression, modeled heteroskedasticity and modeled non-normality. To ease their application in psychological sciences we reformulate all three methods into SEMs. Once formulated as a SEMs, the core identification strategies can readily be adapted to the context of models applied widely in psychological science like growth-, (intense) longitudinal-, multivariate- or measurement-models.