2006
DOI: 10.14358/pers.72.5.591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MTF-tailored Multiscale Fusion of High-resolution MS and Pan Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
388
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 733 publications
(444 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
388
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the whole procedure rests upon the hypothesis that performance does not depend critically on scale, which is not always the case, as discussed in the Introduction. Therefore, to reduce the possible mismatches, we smooth data before downsampling, following [2,22], using a filter that matches the modulation transfer function of the sensor. Likewise, we upsample the MS component using the interpolation kernel proposed in [13].…”
Section: Basic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, the whole procedure rests upon the hypothesis that performance does not depend critically on scale, which is not always the case, as discussed in the Introduction. Therefore, to reduce the possible mismatches, we smooth data before downsampling, following [2,22], using a filter that matches the modulation transfer function of the sensor. Likewise, we upsample the MS component using the interpolation kernel proposed in [13].…”
Section: Basic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain better coregistered upscaled images, [18] uses the Induction scaling technique, followed by a new fusion technique called Indusion. Other methods following the same philosophy work in a MRA setting, e.g., ATWT [15,[19][20][21] or with LP representations [16,[22][23][24]. Some recent papers, to avoid improper modeling, recast the problem in an optimization framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The names and gain injection equations of the proposed methods are shown in Table 3. The proposed methods were compared with five widely-used algorithms in the literature: WATFRAC [5], BT [16], IHS [13], GS [15] and MTF-GLP [28]. Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution of this new methodology is to produce artifact-free high spatial resolution pansharpened images, improving the MS edges by becoming aware of the scale (scale-aware) in images with a predominantly agricultural landscape. The performance of this method was compared with the WATFRAC, BT, GS, IHS and MTF-GLP (MTF using generalized Laplacian pyramid) [28] algorithms and evaluated using a set of spectral, spatial and overall quality indices [7,8]. The set of quality indices was summarized and compared using the Borda count (BC) method [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRA-based fusion techniques adopt multi-resolution analysis methods, such as multi-resolution wavelet [5,[49][50][51][52][53] and the Laplacian pyramid [54,55], to decompose multispectral and panchromatic images with different levels. They subsequently derive the spatial details that are imported into the finer scales of the multispectral images with respect to the relationship between the panchromatic and multispectral images in the coarser scales [5,54,56,57].…”
Section: A Short Overview Of Existing Pan-sharpening Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%