2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MSI-High RAS-BRAF wild-type colorectal adenocarcinomas with MLH1 loss have a high frequency of targetable oncogenic gene fusions whose diagnoses are feasible using methods easy-to-implement in pathology laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the dMLH1/BRAFV600Ewt subgroup, frequency of NTRK fusions has been reported to be 5-28% [4,16,17] and in the subgroup of dMLH1/MLH1ph 14-19% [18,19], which are in line with our frequencies of 11% (7/62) and 16% (7/43), respectively. Yet other studies have reported NTRK fusions to occur in dMLH1/BRAFV600Ewt/MLH1ph/RASwt subgroup of CRC with as high frequency as 17-44% [15][16][17][18]22] being comparable to our prevalence of 23.3% (7/30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the dMLH1/BRAFV600Ewt subgroup, frequency of NTRK fusions has been reported to be 5-28% [4,16,17] and in the subgroup of dMLH1/MLH1ph 14-19% [18,19], which are in line with our frequencies of 11% (7/62) and 16% (7/43), respectively. Yet other studies have reported NTRK fusions to occur in dMLH1/BRAFV600Ewt/MLH1ph/RASwt subgroup of CRC with as high frequency as 17-44% [15][16][17][18]22] being comparable to our prevalence of 23.3% (7/30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, our NTRK fusion frequency of 0.34% (7/2079) is at the higher end. NTRK1 fusions with TPM3, LMNA and TPR partners have been shown to be the most common ones in CRC [6,7] and PLEKHA6::NTRK1 fusions have also previously been described in this disease [17,18]. Of these, we found NTRK1 to partner with TPM3, LMNA and PLEKHA6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cases included in this study were selected among patients with non‐CRC tumors requiring dMMR testing initially analyzed in Ouest Pathology laboratory. As performed in previous publications of our group, the same formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tumor samples had been previously used for successive IHC (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) and molecular analyses including external testing in a molecular pathology platform (using fragment‐length polymorphism analysis of five microsatellites: BAT26, BAT25, NR21, NR22 , and NR24 ) and before the complementary in‐house Idylla MSI test performed in the present work 10,19,23 . The clinical evolution of the patients and their genetics background in terms of potential Lynch syndromes were not taken into account in this work dedicated to the comparison of diagnostic methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported about the performances of the Idylla MSI test (Biocartis) that allows fully‐automated and rapid (2.5 h) MSI testing and is usable even in pathology laboratories with no expertise in molecular pathology. These studies have particularly reported on the good performances of this test in CRC samples (about 98% sensitivity and 99% specificity about 2000 CRC samples tested in the literature) 9–13,15–20,22,23 . Series of non‐CRC tumors (about 1000 cases including several different organs and tumor types, as endometrial, urothelial, gastric, but also fewer duodenal–pancreatic, ovarian, prostatic, small‐intestine carcinomas, or cutaneous adnexal tumors) have also reported good performances of this Idylla MSI test with nervertheless inferior sensitivity in comparison with CRC (about 92% sensitivity and 99% specificity in non‐CRC tumors) 6–9,11,12,14,15,18,21,23,24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%