2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI findings in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: correlation with histopathology and clinical staging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elias et al evaluated the correlation between MRI findings and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (26). Their report showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between the MRI findings and MELD score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elias et al evaluated the correlation between MRI findings and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (26). Their report showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between the MRI findings and MELD score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, proton MR spectroscopy is evolving to detect not only the full spectrum of steatosis but also other features such as the degree of fibrosis [13,78] . Transabdominal ultrasonography is the most common imaging technique to diagnose hepatic steatosis due to its widespread availability, noninvasiveness and low cost [76] .…”
Section: Clinical Features Of Nafldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Azan, and examined under a light microscope using the DMD108 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Steatosis, inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning [19], macrovesicular steatosis [20], and fibrosis [21] were numbered according to the following classifications: (1) grade of steatosis: 0, none; 1, mild (5-33% of parenchymal involvement by steatosis); 2, moderate (33-66%); 3, severe ([66%); (2) lobular inflammations: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; (3) hepatocyte ballooning: 0, none; 1, few ballooned cells; 2, many cell-prominent ballooning; (4) macrovesicular steatosis: same as steatosis scoring; and (5) fibrosis stage: 1, zone 3 perisinusoidal/pericellular fibrosis; 2, zone 3 perisinusoidal/pericellular fibrosis with focal or extensive periportal fibrosis; 3, zone 3 perisinusoidal/pericellular fibrosis and portal fibrosis with focal or extensive bridging fibrosis; 4, cirrhosis. Then, the NAFLD activity scores (NAS) were calculated according to the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system [19], which has been applied to highfat feeding rats [20].…”
Section: Histopathological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%