MR Imaging of the Prostate

Yacoub, Joseph; Oto, Aytekin; Miller, Frank H.

doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2014.02.010

Cited by 30 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 146 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Excluded (n = 23) Withdrawn consent (8) No surgery was performed Skeletal metastases on MRI (4) Referred to radiation therapy (1) Cancelled surgery (9) Underwent surgery in another country (1) …”

Section: Enrolmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When present, the secondary and tertiary tumour is the two next highest ranking tumours according to the same criteria. The sensitivity of MRI for predicting T3 is limited, ranging from 13% to 95%, depending on patient selection and the method used [8,9]. The laterality of T3 is rarely reported, although it is highly relevant when planning treatment [5,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomised Clinical Trial?

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Enrolmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomised Clinical Trial?

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are only case reports available in the literature concerning the integration of an adequate multiparametric protocol for prostate cancer evaluation. [66][67][68] The advent of 68 galliumlabeled ligand of the prostate-specific membrane antigen has the potential to improve prostate cancer evaluation in cases where even advanced MRI protocols fail to detect early cancer deposits. 69…”

Section: Advanced Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workflow in Simultaneous PET/MRI

Barbosa

Schulthess

Veit-Haibach

2015

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Limitations when locally staging prostate cancer for treatment planning purposes include: low specificity, missed regions of the prostate during DRE or biopsy (e.g., anterior tumours), and potentially inaccurate information regarding tumour volume, extent and aggressiveness of disease with DRE and non-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy. 2 There is renewed interest in the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (± functional sequences) in the local staging of prostate cancer. T2-weighted MRI for local staging of prostate cancer traditionally involves high-resolution imaging, which delineates the prostatic anatomy in detail.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline

Salerno

Finelli

Morash

et al. 2016

CUAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The utility of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of prostate cancer is controversial. Due to the success of multiparametric MRI in cancer localization, there is renewed interested in MRI (± functional sequences) for local staging. Guidance on pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer by MRI was developed using systematic review methodology and expert consultation. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched to identify studies comparing: (1) MRI staging vs. radical prostatectomy staging on diagnostic accuracy outcomes; and (2) MRI staging vs. routine clinical staging on clinical and patient outcomes. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were synthesized by outcome and sensitivity/ specificity analysis by tumour location was performed. Evidence quality of included studies was assessed and considered in recommendation formulation. Results: The literature search identified 2510 citations; 62 studies were included. Analysis of MRI ≥1.5 T plus endorectal coil (ER) (± functional sequences) in the detection of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion showed modest sensitivities (≥50%) and excellent specificities (>85%) among patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy. MRI upstaging was shown in 20/21 studies, with large variation in correctness (11-85%). Scarcity of clinical and patient outcomes among studies limited synthesis and evaluation. Quality assessment found non-trivial biases. Conclusions: Modest imaging performance was shown for MRI (1.5 T + ER and 3 T ± ER) ± functional sequences in regards to sensitivity. Limitations in study design, reporting of clinical and patient outcomes, and the heterogeneous use of MRI tempered the strength of the recommendations.

show abstract

MR Imaging of the Prostate

Cited by 30 publications

References 146 publications

Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomised Clinical Trial?

Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomised Clinical Trial?

Workflow in Simultaneous PET/MRI

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About