2012
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/21/4/045006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR damper based implementation of nonlinear damping for a pitch plane suspension system

Abstract: Suppression of vibration transmission from working machineries and other sources is important for the normal operation of a wide range of engineering systems. Traditionally, viscous dampers with approximately linear characteristics are often used to address the issue. However, this solution can have the problem of not being able to reduce the vibration transmission over the whole range of frequencies. In recent studies, the authors have revealed, by both theoretical analysis and experimental test, that nonline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be assumed, that there is an increase of ride comfort of the vehicle crew in whole range of frequency of excitation signal. In case of linear suspension model similar result was achieved by Laalej et al (2012). During work over formulating sky-hook control strategy, the nonlinear characteristic of spiral spring has been considered in this article.…”
Section: Simulation Researchsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It can be assumed, that there is an increase of ride comfort of the vehicle crew in whole range of frequency of excitation signal. In case of linear suspension model similar result was achieved by Laalej et al (2012). During work over formulating sky-hook control strategy, the nonlinear characteristic of spiral spring has been considered in this article.…”
Section: Simulation Researchsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Internal feedback P-controller loop (alternatively to PI-controller [27] with settings as in [24,26]) with MR damper real-time force measurement is implemented in such a force follow-up algorithm [24,26,27]. P-controller proportional gain is 0.04, saturation limits are (0, 1) A, and a measurement signal scaling factor (alpha) is equal to 0.75.…”
Section: Linear Damping (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution is MR damper based implementation of nonlinear damping [26][27][28] in (MR) TVA system. Two approaches considered here are:…”
Section: Nonlinear Damping (C3 and Sqrt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of wind turbine tower vibration control with an MR TVA, utilising an adaptive stiffness concept with a newly developed force tracking algorithm, is presented here. Both the adaptive stiffness and the MR damper force tracking solutions were investigated previously separately; however, only limited (numerical or hardware in the loop only, continuous -with no discontinuities or two-level force/current pattern regarded) implementation scenarios were presented, [28][29][30][31][32] or the quality of the force follow-up left the field for further improvements. [24][25][26] The MR damper real-time force tracking problem along with the adaptive stiffness and damping/friction was investigated extensively with fair results in previous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, measured real-time tracking of force patterns is characterised with insufficiently rapid force rise or significant overshoot, both after force sign change. The current work covers real-time realisation of the improved (over the previous solutions [24][25][26]29,31,32,37 ) stock MR damper continuous pattern tracking algorithm coping well with the discontinuities (rapid value changes) of the force and the magnetic remanence, combining MR damper forward model with force sign change prediction (feed forward), force sensor feedback and dedicated logics, together with a basic adaptive stiffness implementation, resulting in a quality vibration reduction system. As a reference, passive solutions with several MR damper constant input current values, the adaptive stiffness concept with previously tested MR damper hyperbolic tangent inverse model and PI-based force tracking algorithms, [24][25][26]29,31,32,37 along with a modified ground hook control 25,26 results are presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%