2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2284-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond the plane: measuring 3D home ranges of juvenile salamanders with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After measuring their phenotype, we individually marked salamanders and tracked dispersal in field enclosures. We marked salamanders with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags (Ousterhout andSemlitsch 2014, Ousterhout andBurkhart 2017). PIT tags allow otherwise prohibitively small animals to be tracked over sustained periods of time from a limited distance (Connette andSemlitsch 2012, Ousterhout andSemlitsch 2014).…”
Section: Juvenile Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After measuring their phenotype, we individually marked salamanders and tracked dispersal in field enclosures. We marked salamanders with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags (Ousterhout andSemlitsch 2014, Ousterhout andBurkhart 2017). PIT tags allow otherwise prohibitively small animals to be tracked over sustained periods of time from a limited distance (Connette andSemlitsch 2012, Ousterhout andSemlitsch 2014).…”
Section: Juvenile Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have effectively used long, rectangular enclosures to assay amphibian movement (Rosenberg et al 1998, Rothermel and Semlitsch 2002, Osbourn et al 2014). Here we used enclosures that were over 14 times longer than the median home range of juvenile ringed salamanders (Ousterhout and Burkhart 2017). Each enclosure (50  2 m) was made from 90 cm tall silt fence wall that extended 15 cm underground and had a 10 cm wide baffle.…”
Section: Juvenile Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several characteristics make these species excellent subjects for evaluating the effects of urbanization with a landscape genetics approach. For instance, the species have small annual home ranges (spotted salamanders: up to 301 m 2 , Ousterhout and Burkhart, 2017;wood frogs: up to 32,165 m 2 , Blomquist & Hunter, 2010;Groff, Calhoun & Loftin, 2017), relatively short generation times (spotted salamanders: maturity in 2-7 years, Flageole & Leclair, 1992; wood frogs: maturity in 2-3 years, Sagor, Ouellet, Barten, & Green, 1998), and high rates of philopatry (Vasconcelos & Calhoun, 2004). Both species are vulnerable to degradation of the breeding sites they share within their overlapping ranges in the northeastern United States (Harper, Rittenhouse, & Semlitsch, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, the first two represent the surface of the Earth and are either represented as geographic coordinates (longitude, latitude) or projected in some type of projected coordinate system (x – northing, y – easting). The third coordinate differs depending on the animal species: it can be elevation for species moving in highly variable terrain, such as deer in the mountains [2], altitude above the surface of the Earth for flying species [3] and species with a habitat in the forest canopies [4] or depth for fish [5, 6] or fossorial species [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many current tracking technologies allow location sampling in three physical dimensions: for example, GPS trackers measure elevation as well as longitude and latitude (although with worse accuracy for elevation than for the two surface dimensions) [8] and many bio-loggers for marine species include depth sensors [9]. Three-dimensional location can also be extracted from stereo video footage [6] or in recent studies sometimes using passive integrated transponder tracking [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%