2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor deficits in 16-month-old male and female 3xTg-AD mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…APP+PS1 mice develop memory deficits at younger ages, similar to 5XFAD mice. Noteworthy, female and male 3xTg mice show memory impairments before the onset of motor deficits with 16 months of age (Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019), similar to Tg4-42 mice (Table 1), but memory deficits do not progress through age in 3xTg mice (Stevens and Brown, 2015). These inconsistent findings with regard to onset of memory and motor deficits should be considered when choosing a suitable mouse model for research, depending on the symptom of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…APP+PS1 mice develop memory deficits at younger ages, similar to 5XFAD mice. Noteworthy, female and male 3xTg mice show memory impairments before the onset of motor deficits with 16 months of age (Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019), similar to Tg4-42 mice (Table 1), but memory deficits do not progress through age in 3xTg mice (Stevens and Brown, 2015). These inconsistent findings with regard to onset of memory and motor deficits should be considered when choosing a suitable mouse model for research, depending on the symptom of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…APP/PS1 KI mice did not show any motor deterioration and were comparable to controls at even older ages (Webster et al, 2013). Strikingly, male and female 3xTg mice performed better in rotarod task than controls up to the age of 16 months (Oore et al, 2013; Stover et al, 2015; Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019) (Table 1), but performance declined with age (Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019). Only Filali et al (2012) who tested only female 3xTg mice showed reduced performance in the rotarod, possibly due to protocol differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, 3xTg-AD mice at both 6-months (Stover et al, 2015a) and 16-months (Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019) of age show improved performance as compared to WT controls on the rotarod test suggesting improved motor coordination. Importantly, however, 16-month old 3xTg-AD mice show an age-dependent deficit in performance on rotarod, grip strength, gait analysis and balance beam tests as compared to younger 6-month old 3xTg-AD mice (Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019). Overall, these findings underscore the importance of evaluating performance of 3xTg-AD mice on AD-related cognitive tasks in the context of potential motor abnormalities.…”
Section: Normal Motor Functionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Increased anxiety and depression-like behaviors have also been shown in the 3xTg-AD mice by 7 months of age (Romano et al, 2014; Zhang et al, 2016; Nie et al, 2017). However, these mice show better motor performance on the rotarod than wild-type (WT) controls (Stover et al, 2015a; Garvock-de Montbrun et al, 2019). In this study, male and female 3xTg-AD and WT mice were treated with DWG-1036 from 2 to 6 months of age and then tested in a behavioral test battery that measured spatial learning and memory, working memory, motor coordination and learning, anxiety, and depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%