2018
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor cortex synchronization influences the rhythm of motor performance in premanifest huntington's disease

Abstract: Our data may model the ability of the motor command to respond to more subtle, physiological inputs from other brain areas. This novel insight indicates that impairments of the timing accuracy of synchronization and desynchronization could be a physiological basis for some key clinical features of Huntington's disease. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Panel (b): Global cortical response is displayed in terms of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) recorded over all the scalp with the scalp voltage distribution at the three main peaks of activity (20-40 ms, 40-70 ms, and 70-150 ms)interhemispheric reduction of TMS-evoked activity was observable only when stimulating the UH, but not when stimulating the AH(Figure 1a). Spatiotemporal reconstruction of global TMS-evoked cortical activity(Figure 1b stroke patients; Figure 2b HC)revealed a wellknown sequence of positive and negative deflections lasting ≈250 ms, as usually observed after M1 stimulation(Casula et al, 2016;Casula, Mayer, et al, 2018;Casula, Rocchi, Hannah, & Rothwell, 2018). A first activation was focused over the stimulated M1 (20-40 ms) with an immediate spread over ipsilateral posterior areas (40-70 ms) and frontal areas (100 ms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Panel (b): Global cortical response is displayed in terms of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) recorded over all the scalp with the scalp voltage distribution at the three main peaks of activity (20-40 ms, 40-70 ms, and 70-150 ms)interhemispheric reduction of TMS-evoked activity was observable only when stimulating the UH, but not when stimulating the AH(Figure 1a). Spatiotemporal reconstruction of global TMS-evoked cortical activity(Figure 1b stroke patients; Figure 2b HC)revealed a wellknown sequence of positive and negative deflections lasting ≈250 ms, as usually observed after M1 stimulation(Casula et al, 2016;Casula, Mayer, et al, 2018;Casula, Rocchi, Hannah, & Rothwell, 2018). A first activation was focused over the stimulated M1 (20-40 ms) with an immediate spread over ipsilateral posterior areas (40-70 ms) and frontal areas (100 ms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Pattern of activation was similar, in terms of waveform and amplitude, between the stimulations of two hemispheres, with a strong reduction of activity in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulation. Analysis of global TMS-evoked cortical activity (figure 1B)revealed a well-known sequence of positive and negative deflections lasting ≈250 ms, as usually observed after M1 stimulation(Casula et al, 2016;2018a;2018b). A first activation was focused over the stimulated M1 (20-40 ms) with an immediate spread over ipsilateral posterior areas and frontal areas (100 ms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We noted with interest that the Q‐Motor speeded tapping measures recorded in the “digitomotography” assessment provided a sensitive measure for correlations with cortical oscillations in the theta frequency band. Casula and colleagues conclude: “participants who showed better timed motor performance also showed stronger oscillatory synchronization”—see their figure 4 showing the “Inter‐Tap‐Interval‐Standard‐Deviation.” This is consistent with correlations seen between speeded tapping intervals and their variability and caudate volumes, white matter volumes, cortical thickness, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in HD . Tapping is thought to represent fine motor control and coordination with a strong link to voluntary motor function …”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We read with interest the article by Casula and colleagues titled “Motor Cortex Synchronization Influences the Rhythm of Motor Performance in Premanifest Huntington's Disease.” We are pleased to see that the sensitivity provided by rater‐independent objective and quantitative‐motor (Q‐Motor) measures helps to shed light on the functional relevance of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in Huntington's disease (HD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%