1981
DOI: 10.1179/jbr.1981.11.4.609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mosses of Europe and the Azores; an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
127
0
8

Year Published

1984
1984
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
127
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…All data were collected at the peak biomass period. Authorities for plant species follow Corley et al (1981) for mosses, Grolle (1983) for hepatics, and Tutin et al (1964-80) for vascular plants.…”
Section: Vegetation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were collected at the peak biomass period. Authorities for plant species follow Corley et al (1981) for mosses, Grolle (1983) for hepatics, and Tutin et al (1964-80) for vascular plants.…”
Section: Vegetation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This percentage is a large one, and whereas some temperate regions with oceanic climates (e.g., the British Isles with 662 mosses, 287 hepatics and homworts, and 1634 native angiosperms) approach this figure, I believe that few temperate regions would exceed it. The landmass of Europe, by contrast, has only 15 I 8 bryophytes, 15% of the number (10,300) of native angiosperms (Corley et al 1981, Grolle 1983, Webb 1978.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corley & al., 1981;Nyholm, 1965). However other characters, such as entire strongly falcate leaves with smooth (or nearly so) laminal cells, suggest its more close relation to Hypnum, rather than to Ctenidium.…”
Section: MMmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time most European bryologists considered both E. cladorrhizans and E. schleicheri present in Europe. However these taxa were treated in different ways, so even in recent publications (Corley & al., 1981) it has been noted that this problem needs further study. In the North America E. cladorrhizans is more common, while E. schleicheri have been revealed in few places only recently (Buck & Crum, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%