2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-015-9364-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs

Abstract: The present work investigates whether and how morphological decomposition processes bias the reading of Hebrew heterophonic homographs, i.e., unique orthographic patterns that are associated with two separate phonological, semantic entities depicted by means of two morphological structures (linear and nonlinear). In order to reveal the nature of morphological processes involved in the reading of Hebrew homographs, we tested 146 university students with three computerized experiments, each experiment focusing o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, studies measured morphological awareness and one or more of the following skills: phonological awareness, orthographic awareness, vocabulary, word reading, spelling, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Studies that were not written in English (e.g., Blondet & Guiraud, 2017; da Mota, 2012), that did not measure either morphological awareness or one of the other skills mentioned above (e.g., Miller et al, 2016; Schiff & Raveh, 2006; Varma et al, 1985), and of which the measures had not assessed morphological awareness per se (e.g., morpho-syntax that confounds morphological awareness with syntactic awareness; Hu, 2010; de Oliveira et al, 2017; Reese, 2009) were excluded in the screening process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, studies measured morphological awareness and one or more of the following skills: phonological awareness, orthographic awareness, vocabulary, word reading, spelling, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Studies that were not written in English (e.g., Blondet & Guiraud, 2017; da Mota, 2012), that did not measure either morphological awareness or one of the other skills mentioned above (e.g., Miller et al, 2016; Schiff & Raveh, 2006; Varma et al, 1985), and of which the measures had not assessed morphological awareness per se (e.g., morpho-syntax that confounds morphological awareness with syntactic awareness; Hu, 2010; de Oliveira et al, 2017; Reese, 2009) were excluded in the screening process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are more than fifty scientifically documented types of synesthesia, which run in families and are common in many creative women [2,3]. Most people see associative perception as evidence of creative exuberance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is such an automated behavior that people generally do not realize how complex the reading process can be. Over the past 40 years, many researchers have been investigating whether the brain processes a word as a whole or decomposes it into its morphemic components and then regains its meaning (Amenta et al 2015;Domínguez et al 2000;Miller et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%