“…This, it has been argued, is because university policies have ostensibly been ‘driven by economic considerations’ (Shohamy, , p. 208). Discursively and rhetorically, initiatives to introduce EMI have been articulated via legitimating frameworks which affirm its putative economic benefits in a globalized world where knowledge and disciplinary meanings are created and disseminated competitively (Coleman, ; Hult, ; Iino, ; Kim, Tatar, & Choi, ). Such rhetoric in turn follows representations of English's role ‘in a new global world where it serves as the main lingua franca’ (Shohamy, , p. 197), which Hult (), following Phillipson's (, ) analysis of domains and orientations of English, expands on in his discussion of English's functions as a lingua academica and lingua economica .…”