2001
DOI: 10.1080/13669870010027640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One argument in its favour is that its use would prevent the accidental spillovers on to other germplasm in adjacent locations, thereby improving biosafety. People who hold this view argue that there are other mechanisms to assist the poor small farmer in developing countries [10]. The development and use of GURTs should not therefore be banned on poverty grounds such as this.…”
Section: (Iv) 'Terminator Technology' and Farmed Saved Seedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One argument in its favour is that its use would prevent the accidental spillovers on to other germplasm in adjacent locations, thereby improving biosafety. People who hold this view argue that there are other mechanisms to assist the poor small farmer in developing countries [10]. The development and use of GURTs should not therefore be banned on poverty grounds such as this.…”
Section: (Iv) 'Terminator Technology' and Farmed Saved Seedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful at this stage in the argument to distinguish between two criticisms of this view. 10 The first is a systems criticism. The second one is an ethical one.…”
Section: (Ii) Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations