2006
DOI: 10.1080/10683160500036855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral judgement, cognitive distortions and empathy in incarcerated delinquent and community control adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
52
2
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
52
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This was true for both the adults and the adolescents and in line with previous research on adolescents (e.g. Barriga et al, 2001;Lardén et al, 2006). Consequently, the discriminant validity of the HIT was supported for the studied groups.…”
Section: ………………………… Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was true for both the adults and the adolescents and in line with previous research on adolescents (e.g. Barriga et al, 2001;Lardén et al, 2006). Consequently, the discriminant validity of the HIT was supported for the studied groups.…”
Section: ………………………… Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Interestingly, the adolescent groups showed more self-serving cognitive distortions than the adult groups. One possible explanation to this phenomenon could be that the adults had developed more mature moral judgments, as Lardén et al (2006) have previously shown a moderate relationship between socio-moral reasoning and self-serving cognitive distortions. Johnstone and Cooke (2004) suggest that antisocial behavior and egocentricism are more characteristic in youth than in adults due to transient developmental states, which would be in line with adolescents exhibiting more self-serving cognitive distortions than adults.…”
Section: ………………………… Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, there exists no preexisting theory to label and explain specific types of empathic behaviour displayed by police officers during interviews with sex offenders (or indeed any type of offender), and the limited amount of published research has employed a broad operational definition of empathy (see also Oxburgh & Ost, 2011;Oxburgh et al, 2012;Oxburgh et al, 2015). Given that empathy is a complex and multifaceted cognitive and social phenomenon (e.g., Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004;Larden, Melin, Holst, & Langstrom, 2006), grounded theory was employed to label types of empathy in the first instance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%