2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoliths with MFI zeolite layers prepared with the assistance of 3D printing: Characterization and performance in the gas phase isomerization of α-pinene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to DIW, 3D printing of scaffolds prepared in this way begins by densifying a printable paste which contains some mixture of inert binders, plasticizers, and solvents, but unlike DIW, structured scaffolds prepared by secondary growth do not utilize a high concentration of the active material to generate functionality. Instead, the printed “support” is a growth seed, such as metal oxide or small quantities of the active material, which allows for coordination of the active layer after initial hardening. ,, As an alternative, scaffolds can also be formulated via secondary growth by utilizing precursors in conjunction with a template, followed by in situ coordination to produce the active species (Figure b). ,, As yet another alternative, an active species loading can also be deposited onto an inert 3D-printed scaffold by way of dip coating, such as in the case of oxide catalysts deposited onto printed polymer scaffolds (Figure c). In many cases, these approaches can be advantageous to DIW, as they can be used to overcome the binding limitations associated with bulky particulate, especially MOFs and COFs.…”
Section: Printing Strategies Of Structured Adsorbents and Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to DIW, 3D printing of scaffolds prepared in this way begins by densifying a printable paste which contains some mixture of inert binders, plasticizers, and solvents, but unlike DIW, structured scaffolds prepared by secondary growth do not utilize a high concentration of the active material to generate functionality. Instead, the printed “support” is a growth seed, such as metal oxide or small quantities of the active material, which allows for coordination of the active layer after initial hardening. ,, As an alternative, scaffolds can also be formulated via secondary growth by utilizing precursors in conjunction with a template, followed by in situ coordination to produce the active species (Figure b). ,, As yet another alternative, an active species loading can also be deposited onto an inert 3D-printed scaffold by way of dip coating, such as in the case of oxide catalysts deposited onto printed polymer scaffolds (Figure c). In many cases, these approaches can be advantageous to DIW, as they can be used to overcome the binding limitations associated with bulky particulate, especially MOFs and COFs.…”
Section: Printing Strategies Of Structured Adsorbents and Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turpentine is a valuable and renewable natural resource widely used in the medical industry, for the synthesis of new important chemicals foruse as cosmetic, flavours, fragrances, and pharmaceuticals sectors as well as in the synthesis of chemical intermediates [3]. Thus, α-Pinene is considered a versatile building block for the synthesis of high-value added chemicals, mainly through catalytic processes, such as hydration [4,5,6,7,8,9], isomerization [10,11], epoxidation and pinene oxide isomerization [12,13,14], esterification [15,16], and etherification [17,18,19,20,21,22], among others can be applied to obtain a wide variety of added value products.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the methanol conversion on the TMPS catalyst was slightly larger than on the commercial metal fiber sintered catalyst, due to the extended contact time in the TPMS design. [50] Michorczyk et al [48,244] fabricated Al 2 O 3 catalysts with hierarchical channels (Figure 15n), which were utilized in the oxidative coupling of methane. As illustrated in Figure 15n, the channel sizes of the first generation for the T1 and T2 catalysts are 0.6 and 0.3 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Chemical Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%