2018
DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.013106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolithic silicon-photonic platforms in state-of-the-art CMOS SOI processes [Invited]

Abstract: Integrating photonics with advanced electronics leverages transistor performance, process fidelity and package integration, to enable a new class of systems-on-a-chip for a variety of applications ranging from computing and communications to sensing and imaging. Monolithic silicon photonics is a promising solution to meet the energy efficiency, sensitivity, and cost requirements of these applications. In this review paper, we take a comprehensive view of the performance of the silicon-photonic technologies dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, a potential on-board layout of the 40 Gb/s C2C interconnect will probably eliminate the need for SOAs in the transmission lines, turning C2C energy consumption into a parameter that depends solely on the power requirements of the RM and its respective electronic driver, the PD-TIA and the external LD that feeds the RM with the CW optical beam. Considering the employment of state-ofthe-art RM drivers [138] and assuming an LD with 6.1 dBm output power and a 10% wall-plug efficiency, the energy efficiency of the proposed 40 Gb/s C2C photonic link was estimated at 5.95 pJ/bit that increases to 6.25 pJ/bit when incorporating also state-of-the-art SerDes [139] , assuming a LD-to-RM coupling loss of 3dB [140], a RM insertion loss of 1.5 dB, 0.5dB for every Silicon-to-polymer and polymer-to-Silicon waveguide coupling [131] and an AWGR channel insertion loss of 6dB [135]. These energy efficiency values suggest a 63.3% and 61.4% improvement, respectively, compared to the 16.2 pJ/bit link energy efficiency of Intel QPI [134].…”
Section: A 40 Gb/s C2c Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, a potential on-board layout of the 40 Gb/s C2C interconnect will probably eliminate the need for SOAs in the transmission lines, turning C2C energy consumption into a parameter that depends solely on the power requirements of the RM and its respective electronic driver, the PD-TIA and the external LD that feeds the RM with the CW optical beam. Considering the employment of state-ofthe-art RM drivers [138] and assuming an LD with 6.1 dBm output power and a 10% wall-plug efficiency, the energy efficiency of the proposed 40 Gb/s C2C photonic link was estimated at 5.95 pJ/bit that increases to 6.25 pJ/bit when incorporating also state-of-the-art SerDes [139] , assuming a LD-to-RM coupling loss of 3dB [140], a RM insertion loss of 1.5 dB, 0.5dB for every Silicon-to-polymer and polymer-to-Silicon waveguide coupling [131] and an AWGR channel insertion loss of 6dB [135]. These energy efficiency values suggest a 63.3% and 61.4% improvement, respectively, compared to the 16.2 pJ/bit link energy efficiency of Intel QPI [134].…”
Section: A 40 Gb/s C2c Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we are interested in realization of the proposed concept in advanced CMOS processes, such as "zero-change" monolithic electronic-photonic 45 nm CMOS [17]. Integration of silicon photonic devices and circuits in advanced RF CMOS processes (some having standard f T /f max of 305/380 GHz [18] and f T as high as 485 GHz [19]), in close proximity to RF-electronic circuits, bears potential for realization of large-scale, on-chip MWP systems, such as RF-optical beamforming networks for next generation mobile communication systems, satellite-based mm-wave sensors for atmospheric temperature sounding [4], etc.…”
Section: The Proposed Modulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various viable solutions have been proposed in the literature for the inclusion of the optical layer in the chip stack. For example, the optical layer can be placed on-top of the electronic interconnection layers [27,28] as shown in Figure 1, or in plane with it [29][30][31]. The layer stack is finally completed by additional upper layers accounting for possible passivation/filling materials and for the outer package enclosure.…”
Section: Physical Description Of the On-chip Optical Wireless Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%