2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-02897-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring tool wear and surface roughness in the face milling process of high-strength compacted graphite cast irons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the inset graph shows a pe ulated signal, where the cutting force signal variations can be identified. Th current profiles are commonly reported [14] and can be found when measu force with dynamometers [6]. Signal filtering is necessary to remove the en isolate and analyze the signal variations corresponding to the cutting force, a in Figure 6.…”
Section: Time and Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen, the inset graph shows a pe ulated signal, where the cutting force signal variations can be identified. Th current profiles are commonly reported [14] and can be found when measu force with dynamometers [6]. Signal filtering is necessary to remove the en isolate and analyze the signal variations corresponding to the cutting force, a in Figure 6.…”
Section: Time and Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electric current signal can be processed to obtain different machinability parameters to characterize tool life and workpiece surface roughness. Skewness and kurtosis effectively identify the workpiece surface conditions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect method makes up for the shortage of direct measurement, which is realized by sensor signals related to tool wear. The tool condition is estimated according to measurable signals, such as forces [6][7][8][9], acoustic emission (AE) [10][11][12][13], vibration [14][15][16], and motor current [17][18][19]. Li [7] extracted 14 time-domain features from forces and established the relationship between time-domain features and tool wear state with the v-SVR model, which was used to monitor the tool wear in turning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect method makes up for the shortage of direct measurement, which is realized by sensor signals related to tool wear. The tool condition is estimated according to measurable signals, such as forces [6][7][8][9], acoustic emission (AE) [10][11][12][13], vibration [14][15][16], and motor current [17][18][19]. Li [7] extracted 14 time-domain features from forces and established the relationship between time-domain features and tool wear state with the v-SVR model, which was used to monitor the tool wear in turning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%