2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the cohesive damage of the adhesive layer in CFRP double-lapped bonding joint based on non-uniform strain profile reconstruction using dynamic particle swarm optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the FBG is affected by a nonuniform strain, complex changes in the FBG reflection spectrum can be measured by a spectrum analyzer [20,21]. At this time, the signal measured by the FBG is a one-dimensional vector, which contains plentiful original features [22]. Zhang combined finite element analysis with an FBG reflection spectrum simulation technique to predict the spectral signal of a damaged flexible corrugated skin [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the FBG is affected by a nonuniform strain, complex changes in the FBG reflection spectrum can be measured by a spectrum analyzer [20,21]. At this time, the signal measured by the FBG is a one-dimensional vector, which contains plentiful original features [22]. Zhang combined finite element analysis with an FBG reflection spectrum simulation technique to predict the spectral signal of a damaged flexible corrugated skin [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S Jiang et al 16 proposed a method to measure the elastic modulus of CFRP based on FBG reflectance spectrum analysis. C Song et al 17 calculated the reflection spectrum of FBG for reconstructing the adherend strain profile of FBG sensing area with the dynamic particle swarm optimization algorithm. H Haixiao 18 used the spectral distortion of built-in FBG sensors to monitor the damage of the adhesive-bonded joints to speculate the debonding length of the joints, but could not predict the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%