2015
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v35n6p1079-1092/2015
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Statistical process control in mechanized farming is a new way to assess operation quality. In this sense, we aimed to compare three statistical process control tools applied to losses in sugarcane mechanical harvesting to determine the best control chart template for this quality indicator. Losses were daily monitored in farms located within Triângulo Mineiro region, in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. They were carried over a period of 70 days in the 2014 harvest. At the end of the evaluation period, 194 samples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cunha et al (2014) observed that the control charts were effective tools in detecting the total losses of the industrial tomato crop, because it was detected that the process was out of control and that the adoption of corrections in the process would provide a better harvesting efficiency (Cunha et al 2014). Voltarelli et al (2015) used the control charts as an indicator of quality in the monitoring of losses in mechanized harvesting of sugarcane in the Triângulo Mineiro region, in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The control charts for individual values and for exponentially weighted moving averages were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunha et al (2014) observed that the control charts were effective tools in detecting the total losses of the industrial tomato crop, because it was detected that the process was out of control and that the adoption of corrections in the process would provide a better harvesting efficiency (Cunha et al 2014). Voltarelli et al (2015) used the control charts as an indicator of quality in the monitoring of losses in mechanized harvesting of sugarcane in the Triângulo Mineiro region, in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The control charts for individual values and for exponentially weighted moving averages were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no point is highlighted in the control chart, it is considered that there are no special causes of variation and, consequently, the process will be considered as "stable" or "under statistical control". Voltarelli et al (2015) report that, regardless of the assumption of data normality, the use of control charts of individual values is adequate for the monitoring and analysis of the process, provided that the analyst has deep knowledge on the analyzed quality indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the assumption of normality, these control chart models can be used to analyze and detect the intrinsic and extrinsic variability to the mechanized agricultural processes since the full knowledge of the process is essential for managing the operation (Voltarelli et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%