Monilia of the Tongue

Frost, Kendal

doi:10.1001/archderm.1929.01440060047005

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The smooth tongue is occasionally seen in Candida infections but nearly always with the characteristic white lesions of the disease (Frost et al, 1929;Bowers and Whimster, 1954). Candida is also found in the glossitis of sprue (Mackie and Fairly, 1929).…”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occult Candidiasis in the Paterson Brown-Kelly Syndrome

Shaheen

1965

J. Laryngol. Otol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occult Candidiasis in the Paterson Brown-Kelly Syndrome

Shaheen

1965

J. Laryngol. Otol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Related to the skin test is the allergic id (monilhid) reaction (92,110,125,155,214). This is manifested by the appearance of a secondary scaly erythematous inflammation on the skin far removed from the site of infection.…”

Section: Immunological Reactions In Moniliasismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Yeast-Like Fungi: Candida and Brettanomyces

Skinner¹

1947

Bacteriological Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

names which we do not accept and have been corrected in accordance with the common interpretation of the International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature, the latter by Buchwald (26), the former by the author" (253). Henrici (111) called attention to the fact that the primary division of yeasts which produce mycelium from those which do not is one that is difficult to make in practice. Most yeasts, if they are studied sufficiently, will be found to produce pseudomycelium or sometime possibly even true mycelium. There are all gradations between no pseudomycelium at all and a pseudomycelium so well developed that it can hardly be differentiated from true mycelium except by following through its formation as it develops in the microscopic field. Stelling-Dekker avoided this difficulty by classifying together ascosporogenous yeasts with and without mycelium. Lodder chose to divide the Cryptococcaceae (Torulopsidaceae) into two subfamilies on this basis. Frankly, the author does not like this division but must confess that he cannot suggest a better one. It is evident that this has given Diddens and Lodder some difficulty also. Diddens and Lodder's subdivision of the Candidoideae into only three genera is both logical and convenient. It is made on the basis of the type of thallospores produced, blastospores or arthrospores. Forms which produce blastospores only are put in the genus Candida or the genus BreUanomyces, those which produce both blastospores and arthrospores are put in the genus Trichosporon, those which produce arthrospores but not blastospores are excluded from the family. These include such organisms as Geotrichum candidum (Oidium lactia). OLD AND RECENT CLASSIFICATIONS OF CANDIDA Candida albicans (Robin) Berkhout is not only the type species of the genus but it is the outstanding species in importance and interest. The confusion in the nomenclature of this species may be appreciated from the fact that Ciferri, Redaelli and Cavallero (52) in 1938 found 45 different binomial synonyms, Diddens and Lodder in 1942 (69) cite 87, and Conant and associates, in 1944 (56) state that there are 172 in the literature! It was just 100 years ago, in 1847, that Robin first described a species 1947] 23

show abstract

Moniliasis and Moniliids

Hopkins¹

1932

Arch Dermatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monilia of the Tongue

Cited by 13 publications

References 3 publications

Occult Candidiasis in the Paterson Brown-Kelly Syndrome

Occult Candidiasis in the Paterson Brown-Kelly Syndrome

The Yeast-Like Fungi: Candida and Brettanomyces

Moniliasis and Moniliids

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About