1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3932(98)00035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary shocks in the G-6 countries: Is there a puzzle?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore re‐estimate the VAR models for each country in vector error correction form, imposing one cointegrating vector. As in Fung and Kasumovich (1998), we maintain the primary identifying restriction that money is neutral in the long run 15 . Generalising the statistical model to allow for cointegration has essentially no effect on our estimates of the liquidity effect and no important effects on the cross‐country inference below.…”
Section: Identifying and Estimating The Liquidity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore re‐estimate the VAR models for each country in vector error correction form, imposing one cointegrating vector. As in Fung and Kasumovich (1998), we maintain the primary identifying restriction that money is neutral in the long run 15 . Generalising the statistical model to allow for cointegration has essentially no effect on our estimates of the liquidity effect and no important effects on the cross‐country inference below.…”
Section: Identifying and Estimating The Liquidity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the ambiguity of these measures, other measures of excess or deficient demand-such as money velocity gaps or external price gaps-may be more useful guides for policy making in developing countries. 17 17 For money gaps see for example Hendry (1995) and Fung and Kasumovich (1998). For external price gaps see Kool and Tatom (1994) and Garcia-Herrero and Pradhan (1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has compared the national Canadian economy to other industrialized nations in terms of domestic output's sensitivity to domestic policy shocks. Both Kim (1999) and Fung and Kasumovich (1997) find that Canada's economy is less responsive to domestic monetary policy shocks than is the U.S. and Germany. In addition, Fung and Kasumovich (1997) also find that France and the U.K. have more sensitivity to domestic monetary policy shocks than does Canada.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%