2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10272-014-0501-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary dialogue 2009–2014: Looking backward, looking forward

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Monetary Dialogues do not seem to have influenced financial market expectations, they do contribute to greater transparency and therefore legitimacy (Collignon and Diessner 2016). Considering the fiscal implications of ECB actions during the sovereign debt crisis, however, the Monetary Dialogue's structure could be reconsidered to ensure adequate accountability (Belke 2014); it also could improve its focus and make better use of the expert reports (Whelan 2014).…”
Section: Unconventional Monetary Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Monetary Dialogues do not seem to have influenced financial market expectations, they do contribute to greater transparency and therefore legitimacy (Collignon and Diessner 2016). Considering the fiscal implications of ECB actions during the sovereign debt crisis, however, the Monetary Dialogue's structure could be reconsidered to ensure adequate accountability (Belke 2014); it also could improve its focus and make better use of the expert reports (Whelan 2014).…”
Section: Unconventional Monetary Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the smooth functioning of the Dialogue has been said to have been threatened by the crisis and the changes it has induced for the ECB, for instance because of its participation in the Troika. 22 The new unconventional monetary policy measures adopted by the ECB over the past years are arguably more difficult to assess and made accountable. This is problematic in the sense that the Monetary dialogue would arguably have to be reformed for functions such as that of financial market supervisor or for the resort to quantitative easing to be covered within its scope, even if, generally, the ECB's accountability framework has been found by the ECB to be resilient in the context of the GFC, allowing for adaptations without any formal amendments.…”
Section: The Ecb and Its Accountability In The Monetary Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussions regarding transparency have been oriented both to 'conventional' monetary policy issues and to the issues emerging from the new role that the ECB has taken during the financial crisis (Belke 2014). Regarding the new role, the ECB introduced a variety of unconventional policy measures such as announcing the Outright Monetary Transaction Programme, the programme under which the ECB can purchase the bonds of European governments in the secondary market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%