2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-021-00856-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molybdenum derived from nanomaterials incorporates into molybdenum enzymes and affects their activities in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, beginning on Day 3, Mo shown a decrease in the spleen and an increase in the liver (Figure S10), which may result from the degradation of MPTF and their further translocating via the splenic vein to the hepatic portal vein and nally being utilized in molybdenum enzymes, consistent with the previous work [51]. Likewise, the excretion of MPTF in vivo after injection for one week was explored (Figure S11).…”
Section: Systemic Toxicity Biodistribution and Biodegradation In Vivosupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, beginning on Day 3, Mo shown a decrease in the spleen and an increase in the liver (Figure S10), which may result from the degradation of MPTF and their further translocating via the splenic vein to the hepatic portal vein and nally being utilized in molybdenum enzymes, consistent with the previous work [51]. Likewise, the excretion of MPTF in vivo after injection for one week was explored (Figure S11).…”
Section: Systemic Toxicity Biodistribution and Biodegradation In Vivosupporting
confidence: 78%
“…While for MoS 2 ‐Agg the obvious explanation is the phagocytic activity of KUP5 cells, the in vivo study by Cao et al. also showed the sequestration of protein‐coated MoS 2 @HSA nanocomplexes by KCs and the uptake of by KCs was around 5.4‐ to 9.2‐fold higher than that by hepatocytes, [ 69 ] however, this does not explain the lack of cytotoxicity of dissolvable MoS 2 ‐PF in these cells. Another explanation is the different sensitivity to nanomaterial toxicity among KCs, LSECs, and hepatocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results suggested that the liver was the main organ where Mo accumulated, which was consistent with previous reports. [40] Although Mo ions were distributed in the liver, kidneys, spleen, lungs, heart, and brain, with primary occurrence in the kidneys, no noticeable signs of pathological tissue abnormalities were observed in any of the major organs examined (Figure S30, Supporting Information). In addition, the biotransformation of MoS 2 leads to the incorporation of molybdenum into molybdenum enzymes, which increases their specific activities in the liver, and MoS 2 has no effect on cytokines involved in the liver.…”
Section: Prevention Of Neurotoxicity In Vitro and Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the biotransformation of MoS 2 leads to the incorporation of molybdenum into molybdenum enzymes, which increases their specific activities in the liver, and MoS 2 has no effect on cytokines involved in the liver. [40] The interaction between 1T-MoS 2 nanosheets and PC12 cells was further measured using FTIR, as shown in Figure S31 in the Supporting Information. The 1T-MoS 2 nanosheets mainly interacted with polysaccharides and proteins of PC12 cells according to the integration of FTIR.…”
Section: Prevention Of Neurotoxicity In Vitro and Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%