EuroVis 2017 - Short Papers 2017
DOI: 10.2312/eurovisshort.20171146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Visualization of Computational Biology Data: A Survey of Surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigate multi-scale representations of the DNA, which relates to work in bio-molecular visualization. Several surveys have summarized work in this field [2,28,29,39], so below we only point out selected approaches. In addition, a large body of work by professional illustrators on mesoscale cell depiction inspired us such as visualizing the human chromosome down to the detail of individual parts of the molecule [19].…”
Section: Scale-dependent Molecular and Genome Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigate multi-scale representations of the DNA, which relates to work in bio-molecular visualization. Several surveys have summarized work in this field [2,28,29,39], so below we only point out selected approaches. In addition, a large body of work by professional illustrators on mesoscale cell depiction inspired us such as visualizing the human chromosome down to the detail of individual parts of the molecule [19].…”
Section: Scale-dependent Molecular and Genome Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a body of work on 3D visualizations of particle data in MD, SPH, and also other fields [2,17]. Since 3D representations are not central in our research, we default to the simplest, useful, particle representation by shaded spheres at particle positions with user-adjustable sizes.…”
Section: D Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completion time it took the users to respond to each question and their answers to the multiple-choice questions are shown in Figure 8. 10. After the initial setting shown in Figure 8.4(a), all participants decided to exclude Generosity in Q1 (Answer: d, Q1), which happened in 2.03 minutes on average.…”
Section: Question-related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this section, we validate our results with cross-validation using eight-folds, and we scan the hyperparameter space for 25 iterations, choosing the model with the best accuracy. The hyperparameters we experimented with (and their intervals) are: number of trees , learning rate (0.0-0.3), maximum depth of a tree (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), subsample ratio of the training instances (0.8-1.0), and fraction of columns to be subsampled (0.8-1.0). All those values can be easily adjusted within the code.…”
Section: System Overview and Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation