2020
DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny reveals high diversity and endemism in the limestone karst‐restricted land snail genus Sophina Benson, 1859 from Myanmar (Eupulmonata: Helicarionidae), with description of four new species

Abstract: Sophina is a poorly known and neglected genus due to the inaccessibility of the Salween Basin, Southern Myanmar. Taxonomic status, distribution, and phylogeny are being revised based on an integrative analysis of genitalia, radula, and molecular data. Morphological variation in shells and genitalia, together with a phylogenetic tree from concatenated data of mitochondrial and nuclear genes, revealed the existence of ten species/subspecies. Penial morphology and genetic divergence were generally consistent and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the phylogenetic relationships among Aenigmatoconcha, Sophina and Chalepotaxis remain unresolved, the genital characters of both groups of Aenigmatoconcha were clearly distinct from Sophina and Chalepotaxis. In the phylogenetic tree of the 28S gene, moreover, these three genera were confirmed as different genera, but the systematic position of two Aenigmatoconcha species (A. clivicola and A. sumonthai) is unresolved (Sutcharit et al 2020a). Further research should include on more genes and more taxa of the Southeast Asian helicarionoids to better understand the phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution of these groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the phylogenetic relationships among Aenigmatoconcha, Sophina and Chalepotaxis remain unresolved, the genital characters of both groups of Aenigmatoconcha were clearly distinct from Sophina and Chalepotaxis. In the phylogenetic tree of the 28S gene, moreover, these three genera were confirmed as different genera, but the systematic position of two Aenigmatoconcha species (A. clivicola and A. sumonthai) is unresolved (Sutcharit et al 2020a). Further research should include on more genes and more taxa of the Southeast Asian helicarionoids to better understand the phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution of these groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The greatest similarity in shell characters occurred in Sophina and Chalepotaxis, but their genitalia are obviously different. The distinctive characters between Aenigmatoconcha and Chalepotaxis have been reported (Tumpeesuwan & Tumpeesuwan 2017;Sutcharit et al 2020a). However, Tumpeesuwan and Tumpeesuwan (2017) did not report the presence of a "penial sheath" and a "flagellum" in A. clivicola (the type species).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations