2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10059-009-0005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogeny of the Family Tephritidae (Insecta: Diptera): New Insight from Combined Analysis of the Mitochondrial 12S, 16S, and COII Genes

Abstract: The phylogeny of the family Tephritidae (Diptera: Tephritidae) was reconstructed from mitochondrial 12S, 16S, and COII gene fragments using 87 species, including 79 tephritid and 8 outgroup species. Minimum evolution and Bayesian trees suggested the following phylogenetic relationships: (1) A sister group relationship between Ortalotrypeta and Tachinisca, and their basal phylogenetic position within Tephritidae; (2) a sister group relationship between the tribe Acanthonevrini and Phytalmiini; (3) monophyly of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both genera were formerly grouped within one single genus until Drew (1989) proposed to restrict Dacus to species with fused abdominal terga, while Bactrocera comprised species with unfused terga. The close phylogenetic relationship of the two genera is further supported by recent molecular phylogenetic studies based mainly on mitochondrial DNA data (Han and McPheron 1997;Smith et al 2003;Segura et al 2006;Han and Ro 2009). It should be noted that B. oleae is present in eastern and southern Africa, and that all its immediate relatives are of African origin (Ian White, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Both genera were formerly grouped within one single genus until Drew (1989) proposed to restrict Dacus to species with fused abdominal terga, while Bactrocera comprised species with unfused terga. The close phylogenetic relationship of the two genera is further supported by recent molecular phylogenetic studies based mainly on mitochondrial DNA data (Han and McPheron 1997;Smith et al 2003;Segura et al 2006;Han and Ro 2009). It should be noted that B. oleae is present in eastern and southern Africa, and that all its immediate relatives are of African origin (Ian White, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Despite the fact that the NJ tree fits very well to both the morphological phylogenetic tree (Korneyev 2000) as well as the recent molecular ones (Han et al 2006, Han and Ro 2009) it is stressed here that this tree may not reflect the true phylogenetic tree, because running the data through a Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses result in different topologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Sequences of Dolichopus brevipennis (Dolichopodidae), Sphaerophoria philanthus (Syrphidae), Chelipoda truncata (Empididae), Hypocera ehrmanni (Phoridae), and Lonchoptera furcata (Lonchopteridae) were used to root the tree (outgroup). Monophyly was constrained for superfamilies, families, sub‐families and genera in which there were recent and well‐supported, multi‐gene or morphological phylogenies for Schizophora: selected Acalyptratae superfamilies (Yeates & Wiegmann, ); Schizophora and Calyptratae (Lambkin et al ., ); Sarcophagidae (Kutty et al ., ; Pape et al ., ); Ravinia (Sarcophagidae) (Giroux et al ., ; Piwczynski et al ., ); Boettcheria (Sarcophagidae) (Piwczynski et al ., ); Luciliinae and Polleniinae (Calliphoridae) (Kutty et al ., ); Phytomyzinae (Agromyzidae) (Scheffer et al ., ); Scathophagidae (Bernasconi et al ., ); Milichiidae (Brake, ); Sciomyzidae, Sciomyzini, Tetanocerini (Tóthová et al ., ); Tephritidae (Han & Ro, ); Drosophilidae (Yassin, ); and Chloropinae (Chloropidae): Brake, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%