2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny of the brachyuran crab superfamily Majoidea indicates close congruence with trees based on larval morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
54
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the monophyletism of some Majoidea families is still controversial [25][26][27], Mithracidae forms a monophyletic well-supported group [28 and references therein]. Because Mithracidae appears to be a cohesive group and the ovary development of the species studied here shows similar patterns in the macroscopic, histological, histochemical and ultrastructural characteristics in all developmental stages, we consider this pattern common to the family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although the monophyletism of some Majoidea families is still controversial [25][26][27], Mithracidae forms a monophyletic well-supported group [28 and references therein]. Because Mithracidae appears to be a cohesive group and the ovary development of the species studied here shows similar patterns in the macroscopic, histological, histochemical and ultrastructural characteristics in all developmental stages, we consider this pattern common to the family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…All sequences were confirmed by sequencing both strands, and a consensus sequence for the two strands was obtained using the software Sequencher 4.5 (Gene Codes Corp). The sequences for another six specimens from four species were retrieved from Genbank (Hultgren & Stachowicz, 2008; Table 1). …”
Section: A T E R I a L S A N D M E T H O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, various phylogenetic studies have supported monophyly of the Brachyura and have begun to reveal internal relationships and clarify the position of this clade relative to other major, decapod lineages (Scholtz & Richter, 1995;Sturmbauer et al, 1996;Ahyong & O'Meally, 2004;Porter et al, 2005;Schubart et al, 2006). Recent studies also have uncovered an evolutionary history much more complex than originally recognized (Ahyong & O'Meally, 2004;Porter et al, 2005;Schubart et al, 2006;Ahyong et al, 2007;Hultgren & Stachowicz, 2008). Furthermore, some systematic studies, combined with behavioural and ecological observations, have exposed the evolutionary basis for most peculiar behaviours and the conditions favouring them (land colonization and subsequent evolution of cooperative behaviour in bromeliad dwelling crabs- Schubart et al, 1998; independent evolutionary origins of tree climbing behaviours- Fratini et al, 2005; increasing complexity of courtship through time- Sturmbauer et al, 1996; origins and evolutionary trade-offs associated with camouflage- Hultgren & Stachowicz, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The larval morphology of species in Epialtidae, Inachidae, Inachoididae, Majidae and Oregoniidae has been used to propose relationships among families and subfamilies and to construct phylogenies. A recent molecular phylogeny supports several relationships predicted from larval, but not from adult, morphology, suggesting that the adult morphological characters traditionally used may be subject to convergence (Hultgren and Stachowicz 2008, and references therein). In fact, zoeal morphology may reflect phylogenetic relationships more accurately than adult morphology since the former live in a uniform planktonic environment subjected to relatively constant selection pressures, although it has been recognised that homoplasy is widespread in brachyuran zoeal lineages and many derived characters evolved many times in different clades (Clark 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%