“…Unfortunately, molecular phylogenies have failed to resolve the relationships and polarity of the sponge classes, although two scenarios have received most of the support: (i) (Hexactinellida plus Demospongea) (Calcarea plus Eumetazoa) (5,6,(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) in which Silicspongea is monophyletic, and (ii) Hexactinellida (Demospongea (Calcarea plus Eumetazoa)) (8,(38)(39)(40)(41), which gives a paraphyletic Silicispongea. The balance of recent molecular phylogenies, based on a range of genes, is approximately equal (42), but with an increasing shift toward silicisponge monophyly [albeit with Homoscleromorpha excluded from both Demospongiae (43) and Silicispongea (44)], particularly in light of corroborative biochemical (7), paleontological (45), and of course mineralogical data. Molecular analyses also consistently identify a close relationship between Calcarea and Ctenophora plus Cnidaria The discovery of an evolutionary intermediate between hexactinellids and calcareans argues strongly against a basal Hexactinellida because this result would require repeated derivation of siliceous spicules secreted onto axial filaments, in hexactinellids and demosponges, and perhaps also Homoscleromorpha.…”