2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogeny of Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyta): An Investigation into the Monophyly and Classification of the Amphoroid Diatoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
55
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current topology (Fig. 15), the Halamphora genus is considered monophyletic (BP 100%), as was also found in the study of Stepanek & Kociolek (2014) and Jiang et al (2015) based on analysis of sequences of the nuclear region (SSU rDNA and 18S rDNA) and the chloroplast (rbcL and psbC). The results showed that the 18S sequences of H. oceanica were associated with two sequences of H. montana (KC736615 & AJ243061).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the current topology (Fig. 15), the Halamphora genus is considered monophyletic (BP 100%), as was also found in the study of Stepanek & Kociolek (2014) and Jiang et al (2015) based on analysis of sequences of the nuclear region (SSU rDNA and 18S rDNA) and the chloroplast (rbcL and psbC). The results showed that the 18S sequences of H. oceanica were associated with two sequences of H. montana (KC736615 & AJ243061).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…( Figure 2) . Stepanek and Kociolek (2014) have already shown that Amphora as a genus is polyphyletic and requires a thorough revision based on frustule and chloroplast as well as DNA sequence data.…”
Section: Yellow Sea Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a considerable number of taxa have been transferred out of Amphora, recent molecular phylogenetic work has demonstrated that the genus, as it is currently conceived, continues to be non-monophyletic, with taxa dispersed widely across raphid diatom lineages (Stepanek & Kociolek 2014). Although Amphora as a whole is non-monophyletic, Stepanek & Kociolek (2014) demonstrated that there are several monophyletic groups outside Amphora s.s. One such group corresponds to Mereschkowsky's Tetramphora and includes several species still placed within Amphora.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Amphora as a whole is non-monophyletic, Stepanek & Kociolek (2014) demonstrated that there are several monophyletic groups outside Amphora s.s. One such group corresponds to Mereschkowsky's Tetramphora and includes several species still placed within Amphora. We present a reexamination of Tetramphora, using light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations of taxa collected from coastal and inland waters of the United States and Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%