2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780471224464.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Paleoscience: Systems Biology from the Past

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 253 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this, a maximally likely ancestral sequence can be identified and synthesized, in order to experimentally test the properties of the ancestral protein (reviewed by Benner et al 2007). While this is the most straightforward approach for inferring ancestral function, the uncertainty in the reconstruction increases dramatically as one moves backwards in time, especially to paralog ancestors before LUCA, where functional divergence has also played a role.…”
Section: Sequence Resurrectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this, a maximally likely ancestral sequence can be identified and synthesized, in order to experimentally test the properties of the ancestral protein (reviewed by Benner et al 2007). While this is the most straightforward approach for inferring ancestral function, the uncertainty in the reconstruction increases dramatically as one moves backwards in time, especially to paralog ancestors before LUCA, where functional divergence has also played a role.…”
Section: Sequence Resurrectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancestral gene reconstruction [98,99] has become broadly used to resurrect ancestral enzymes [100] and signaling proteins [101103,87,104,88,105]. Given the evidence for significant residual codon middle-base pairing in contemporary Class I and Class II sense/antisense alignments (Fig.…”
Section: Evidence For Bi-directional Coding Ancestry: Molecular Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, some recent work has used sequence reconstruction analyses targeting ancestral states represented by nodes in phylogenetic trees and the subsequent laboratory “resurrection” of their encoded proteins (Benner et al, 2007; Harms and Thornton, 2010) to address important issues in protein evolution, such as the role of epistasis in formation of new function (Ortlund et al, 2007), the evolution of complex biomolecular machines (Finnigan et al, 2012), the mechanisms of evolutionary innovation through gene duplication (Voordeckers et al, 2012) and the adaptation of proteins to changing environments over planetary time scales (Gaucher et al, 2008; Perez-Jimenez et al, 2011; Risso et al, 2013). Here we explore the potential of this “vertical” approach to probe the evolution of protein structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%