2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulations of G-DNA and perspectives on the simulation of nucleic acid structures

Abstract: The article reviews the application of biomolecular simulation methods to understand the structure, dynamics and interactions of nucleic acids with a focus on explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations of guanine quadruplex (G-DNA and G-RNA) molecules. While primarily dealing with these exciting and highly relevant four-stranded systems, where recent and past simulations have provided several interesting results and novel insight into G-DNA structure, the review provides some general perspectives on the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
177
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
(228 reference statements)
4
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first limitation is the time-scale of the simulations. As reviewed elsewhere [49], contemporary simulations are equivalent to hypothetical microsecond-scale single molecule experiments where the molecule initially adopts some starting configuration and subsequently undergoes spontaneous unbiased structural dynamics. In other words, our simulations assess the structural stability of potential G-triplex structures and their lifetimes starting from the folded structure.…”
Section: The Sampling Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first limitation is the time-scale of the simulations. As reviewed elsewhere [49], contemporary simulations are equivalent to hypothetical microsecond-scale single molecule experiments where the molecule initially adopts some starting configuration and subsequently undergoes spontaneous unbiased structural dynamics. In other words, our simulations assess the structural stability of potential G-triplex structures and their lifetimes starting from the folded structure.…”
Section: The Sampling Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any Gquadruplex forming strand can in principle adopt altogether 26 distinct G-quadruplex topologies, differing in strand directionality and type of the loops [22,30]. Although not all of them are energetically feasible, at least five three-quartet (and in addition one two-quartet) topologies have already been observed for the human telomeric quadruplex (see above) as dominant equilibrium structures in various atomistic experiments [12e16, 27,29,35,36,49,63]. Further, the G-rich sequence can potentially form quadruplexes with incomplete number of tetrads, including structures with a slipped strand (actually, the two-quartet quadruplex PDB: 2KF8 [12] falls into this category).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a growing interest in targeting the DNA G-quadruplex secondary structure formed in the guanine-rich regions in human telomeres and gene promoters for developing novel anti-cancer therapy 15 . A G-quadruplex is composed of stacked planar structures (G-tetrads) formed by four hydrogen bonded guanines, with additional stabilizing forces from K + or Na + ions located in the central ion channel of the G-tetrad planes 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ligand structures in the two above experiments were really different. Several studies using MM-PBSA method often giving correct trends, however fail to give correct absolute values and often exaggerates the free energy (Šponer, Cang, Cheatham III, 2013). However, in the present study we are able to show the individual energy contributions enabling good understanding in the binding of designed ligands.…”
Section: Free Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…There was also issue concerning on biomolecular force field, which did not take into account electronic effect. On the other hand, MM-PBSA method, which is well known in the prediction of binding free energy of ligand-DNA complexes, apply several approximation such as continuum solvent assumption, which neglect atomistic hydration, as well as simplified entropy calculation (Jayaram, Sprous, Young, Beveridge, 1998;Srinivasan, Cheatham III, Cieplak, Kollman, Case, 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%