2019
DOI: 10.31788/rjc.2019.1245475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Docking Studies of Phytocompounds With Transcriptional Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PDGFR docking result showed that the binding energy of thioxanthones TX1 ‐ 5 was higher than imatinib as a native ligand; in a range of −7.92 until −8.14 kcal mol −1 (see Table 1). The lower of binding energy, the more stable interaction between ligand and receptor, so the more potential anticancer activity of ligand [34,35] . The results showed that the stability of the complex between thioxanthones TX1 ‐ 5 with PDGFR protein was smaller than that of the imatinib, so the theoretical effectiveness as a drug was also weaker than imatinib ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PDGFR docking result showed that the binding energy of thioxanthones TX1 ‐ 5 was higher than imatinib as a native ligand; in a range of −7.92 until −8.14 kcal mol −1 (see Table 1). The lower of binding energy, the more stable interaction between ligand and receptor, so the more potential anticancer activity of ligand [34,35] . The results showed that the stability of the complex between thioxanthones TX1 ‐ 5 with PDGFR protein was smaller than that of the imatinib, so the theoretical effectiveness as a drug was also weaker than imatinib ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular ion fragments ([M] + ) thioxanthones TX3 and TX6 were observed at 228 and 244, respectively. Meanwhile, thioxanthones TX4 and TX5 had characteristic molecular ions (M + 1 and M + 2) with a height ratio of 3 : 1 that confirmed the presence of chlorine isotopes, 35 Cl and 37 Cl. The 1 H-and 13 C-NMR spectra provided other evidences to prove the successful synthesis of thioxanthones.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Thioxanthone Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The docking study of thioxanthone derivatives in pfDHODH protein showed that all compounds had lower binding energy than A26 as a native ligand. The binding energy of all compounds was in the range of -8.45 to -9.55 kcal mol -1 , with the RMSD range of 0.28-0.56 Å (Table 2): the lower the binding energy value, the more stable the protein-ligand complex [30]. The binding energy of all compounds was also lower than benzamide derivatives, with binding energy in the range of -2.84 to -4.11 kcal mol -1 [11].…”
Section: Docking Study Of Thioxanthone Derivatives Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usability of AutoDockTools is evidenced by multiple studies. These include the in silico docking studies to identify the binding activity of carnosine against a subunit of Caspase-3 in human cervical carcinoma models [16], the discovery of strong binding affinities of phytocompounds such as harpagoside, bromelain, and afzelin against key transcriptional factors (p53, AP-1, c-Myc, β-catenin, and HIF-1α) involved in liver cancer [17], and the computational drug-protein interaction analysis affirming mitochondrial complex III as a likely target of metformin in head and neck squamous cell cancer [18]. Similarly, the AutoDock suite was effective in simulating molecular docking between the 1,2,3-triazole moiety and pyrimidine derivatives against cognate receptors in test models of human esophageal cancer revealing hydrogen bond interactions of the ligands with the amino acid residues in the receptor binding sites [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%